He explains his Patents and his Processes against Judges of court of
appeal and 
against Judges of district court – of Düsseldorf - Germany

Dr.-Ing. Th. SARTOROS

 

DAS PATENT "ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISMUS" DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501

WIRD ZUM VERKAUF ANGEBOTEN, PREIS: 265.000,-- € + 19% MWSt

PATENT "ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISM" TO SELL DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501

PRICE 265.000,-- € + 19% Tax (MWSt)

 

 

 

Dr. Th. Sartoros

Laddringsweg 15

45219 ESSEN-Kettwig

February 22, 2020

 

 

 

To the

Prosecutor's office in Düsseldorf

Fritz Roeber Str. 2

40213 Dusseldorf

 

 

 

Here: Criminal complaint against LG-D´dorf judge Ms. Jungclaus, against OLG-D´dorf judge Wolks-

          Falter, against OLG-D´dorf judge Grabensee, against OLG-D´dorf judge Mrs. Baan, as well

          against LG judge Mrs. Tigges, against Mr. Wermeckes (still on duty) and against H. Bünten

         (retired) for crimes in the sense of Section 331 of the Criminal Code or legal deflection in the sense

          of § 339 StGB, too LG Az 2b o 271/01.

 

Abbreviations used

 

AG= a magistrate´s court

ASt = proponent, applicant, petitioner

Az = Number of File

Bl. = sheet of official files

BGH= supreme political Tribunal of Germany

BGB a.F. = Civil Code of old Revision

D´dorf = Düsseldorf (capital of State: North-Rhine-Westphalia=NRW)

DM = money of Germany until 31.1.2002

€ = current money of European Uniom (EU)

EGBGB = Introduction-law of Civil Code

EuGVVO =

EGMR = Court of human Rights (at Strasbourg/Fr)

FA= Tax office

FG = Financial Tribunal

FRG = Federal Republic of Germany

FSK = declaratory lawsuit

GA = Court records, court files

GenStAnw = Office of general Attorney

GG = Constitution of Germany, basic Law

GS = Secretary office

G'scher = the follower

GVG = Tribunal Constitution Law

GVP = Business Distribution plan between the Judges of a tribunal

i.S.d. = at the sense of

LG = regional court (of Düsseldorf)

NAB = non-remedial decisions = instructions for blind

NJW = review of juridical articles    

NRW = North Rhine-Westphalia (state of federal Germany)

NZB= complaint against the non permission of legal complaint

ObStAnw = Upper State Attorney

OFD = Direction of tax offices

OLG= Court of appeal (of Düsseldorf)

PKH= demand for financial judicial aid

RA = lawyer, advocate

StGB= Germany´s penal code

StPO = Germany´s penal procedure
TDM = Thousand of DM

v.A.w = promoted from office

VU = default judgement

ZPO = Civil Procedure Code

 

Dear Sirs and Madames,

 

Herewith the undersigned, address as above, after the end of the procedure 2b o 271/01, bring criminal

complaint against the named LG judge Ms. Jungclaus (currently at the 7th civil chamber LG-D´dorf), against

the OLG judge Ms Wolks-Falter (currently at the 23rd Senate of the OLG-D´dorf), against the OLG-D´dorf

judges Ms. Grabensee (currently at the 14th Senate of the OLG-D´dorf) and

Last modified on Wednesday, 08 April 2020 14:08

 

Dr. Th. Sartoros

Laddringsweg 15

45219 ESSEN-Kettwig

January 16, 2020

 

To the

Prosecutor's office in Düsseldorf

Fritz Roeber Str. 2

40213 Dusseldorf

 

Abbreviations used

LG-D´dorf = regional court of Düsseldorf, OLG = court of appeal of Düsseldorf; AG= a magistrate´s court

StGB = German Penal Code; GVG = Tribunal Constitution Law; GG = Constitution of Germany;

i.d.S. = in the sense; ZPO = Civil Procedure Code; GVP = Business Distribution plan; e.g.= for example

u.v.V. = and linked processes; FA = Tax office; FG = Financial Tribunal; Mädel = young Madams Judges

PKH= demand for financial judicial aid; Az = Number of File; BGB a.F. = Civil Code of old Revision

BGH= supreme political Tribunal of Germany; EGBGB= Introduction-law of Civil Code; RAe= Advocates

GKG= Tribunal Cost Law; GA Bl. = Sheet of official files

 

Here: Criminal charges against LG-D'dorf judge Mrs. Strupp-Müller, against LG-D´dorf judge Galle

            and against the LG cost officer HABICH

           for crimes in the sense of Section 331 of the Criminal Code or legal deflection in the sense of §

           339 StGB, on LG Az 2b o 271/01 as well as against the LG-D´dorf judges Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll

           because of legal infringement i.S.d. § 339 StGB on Az 2b o 271/01 and 2b o 194/07, and against

           LG judges Mrs. Dr. Hoffmann and Mrs. Köstner-Plümpe

 

Dear Sirs and Madames,

Herewith, the undersigned, address as above, has filed a criminal complaint against the named LG judge

Mrs. Strupp-Müller (currently in the 5th civil chamber LG-D´dorf), against the LG judge Galle (currently in the

1st civil chamber of the LG-D ´dorf) and against the LG-D´dorf cost official HABICH for multiple deliberate crimes

in the sense of § 331 StGB or due to several violations of law against § 339 StGB and against law (e.g. Art. 101 GG,

Art. 103 GG, Art. 75 GVG, GVP, § 48 ZPO).

such as

against the LG-D´dorf judge of the 2b civil chamber Mrs Stockschlaeder-Nöll, against Mrs Dr. Hoffmann (currently

at the 29th small punishment chamber of the LG-D´dorf) and against Ms. Köstner-Plümpe for multiple crimes

in the sense of § 331 StGB or due to multiple legal deferrals within the meaning of § 339 StGB to Az 2b o 271/01 or

due to several violations (e.g. Art. 101 GG, Art. 103 GG, Art. 75 GVG, Art. 47 ZPO)

The accused cost official arbitrarily supplemented / falsified

Last modified on Sunday, 02 February 2020 14:50

                               Notice: the follow article is not the last; after reply of General Attorney of HAMM the reader shal be informed

                                                    For errors in this translation (from German to English) please inform the author   

Dr. Th. Sartoros

Laddringsweg 15

45219 Essen-Kettwig

  1. Sept. 2019

 

Attorney General in Hamm

Haßlerstr. 53

59065 HAMM

 

Re: Complaint against the decision of the Public Prosecutor's Essen, of 28.8.2019

        Signed ObStAnw (= superior of public prosecutor) Mr. KALI, Az (= File Number) 25 UJs 41/19,

                                    received 04. Sept. 2019

Dear Madam,

the undersigned (= the injured in his legal interests from the reported or committed illegality of the single judge in

the 7th and 10th Chamber  of the LG-Essen) defends himself against the above Decision of 28.8.2019 of the ObStAnw

(= superior public attorney) Mr. KALI, of the public prosecutor of City Essen, whereby the commencement of investigations

under §§ 152, Abs. 2 and 170 Abs. 2 StPO  (= Penal procedure law)  against the single judge of the LG-Essen the 7th

and 10th Civil Chamber, is rejected.

The decisions of the LG judge and of the Essen public prosecutor also violate the public trust in the judiciary.

The reading of the above Decision 28.8.2019 reveals that the criminally relevant facts on the part of the author

Mr. Kali have not been approximately treated, and also persons are named, which were not even hinted in the

very short entry of 21 July 2019 to the Minister of Justice NRW. 

The faulty mixing of persons and groups is first attacked.

 

The main subject of the law (i.e. bone of contention) is:

 

whether in a PKH (=demand for legal aid) application procedure at the district court, with a dismissed because

of bias of judges, and then with appeal proceedings before the OLG (= court of appeal) against the rejection of

the immediate appeal against the LG-decision (with even  hearings/censure against the (OLG) Higher Regional

Court decision) conduct to one Fee, that the PKH seeker has to pay.

After that, is the question of criminal liability of the LG-single judge according to § 339 StGB ( = Penal Law) to clarify,

if whose decisions contradict the

Last modified on Tuesday, 08 October 2019 15:33

 

Hier follows the second Part of criminal complains against Judges of OLG-Düsseldorf and of LG-Düsseldorf, 

with decription of the crimes of mentioned Judges in Part one (Mrs Stein, Mrs Fuhr, Mrs Glaeser, Mrs Kirschner)

and in addition the description of the crimes of Judges of first instance Mrs Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs Gundlach

and others. The report will be completed later with Copies of the Judgemens and resolutions,also of

No-Remedy-decision (=Instructions for blinds) 

 

  1. Case Mrs. Stein

D1. In addition to above described Crimes of Mrs. Fuhr and Mrs. Glaeser, for which Mrs. Stein

     signed, Mrs Stein bears the responsibility also for the multiple distortions of the facts

     through the intentional lies of the two women (Mrs. Fuhr/Mrs. Glaeser), as well as for

       the legal infringements in the decisions signed by it and judgment of 18.10.2017.

 

D2. The distortion of the facts concerns i.a. the suppression of the facts that the whole

       2001, in the pleadings of the Advocate only of "action" and "claims" or "action with

        PKH application of the same date" or "Plaintiff" is read, which the OLG Panel

       has been silent;

       and in this sense only by PKH application of 5.2.2001 on the part of the Higher Regional Court

       (Mrs. Stein/Mrs. Glaeser/Mrs. Kirschner) is spoken. The Advocate letter of 17.7.2003 (GA Bl.

       283) that the Advocate has filed an UNCONDITIONAL ACTION on 5.2.2001 is nowhere in the

       facts or in the Reasons mentioned; So neither in the LG ruling 11.5.2016 nor in the (OLG) Higher

     Regional Court decisions 3.9.2015 Az 18 W 1/13 or 30.8.2017 and also not mentioned in the

       OLG judgment of 18.10.2017 to Az 18 U 69/16.

 

        Hiding is not an "accidental mistake or overlook of the document" but targeted

        maneuvers to circumvent the "legal consequences of unconditional action" and thus

       the Plaintiff to harm. The deliberate and punishable act of the LG / OLG bodies is of

  • § 339 Penal Code covered and provides for imprisonment of 5 years.

D3. The "notice of the new claims filed on 29.12.2001 arrived to the court on 31.12.2001"

        prove a interrupt of "statute of limitations" according to the Civil Code a.F.

       The fact that the newly filed claims are made known to the (OFD=) Supervision of

     revenue-offices Düsseldorf, proves one Letter from the OFD dated 27.2.2002

       signed Nissen (GA Bl. 168)

      All mentioned Panels

Last modified on Friday, 13 December 2019 19:25

Note please, that in the English translation could creep errors,

The translation is made prevaling from Google translator.

If you find errors send a massage to the author. 

The reader finds in PART ONE the mean near the text of used abbreviations 

A List of abbreviations with translation will  follow at the end of PART TWO.  

Dr. Th. Sartoros

Laddringsweg 15

45219 ESSEN-Kettwig

Sept. 19, 2019

 

To the

Public prosecutor Düsseldorf

Fritz Roeber Str. 2

40213 Düsseldorf/Germany

 

Here: criminal complaint against the judges of Court of Appeal of Düsseldorf/Germany ( = OLG) Mrs.

           Stein / Mrs. Fuhr / Mrs. Glaeser /Mrs. Kirschner for crimes according to § 331 Penal Law or

           right-wing inflection according to § 339 Penal Code, to court of appeal-Az 18 U 69/16 (Appeal

             procedure against regional court-Düsseldorf (=LG) final judgment of 11. May 2016 on Az 2b o

           271/01), also against the regional court of Düsseldorf judges Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs.

           Gundlach/Mrs. Brecht and Mrs. Freitag, because of right inflections according to § 339 Penal

          Code on Az 2b o 271/01 (in the final judgment of 11.5.2016 etc)

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Hereby the signer, address as above, raise criminal complaint against the designated judges of Court of Appeal

of the 18th Civil Senate of Düsseldorf, Mrs. Stein / Mrs. Fuhr / Mrs. Glaeser/Mrs. Kirschner for multiple deliberate

offenses according to § 331 Penal Code among others in the judgment of court of appeal of Düsseldorf of 18.10.2017

to Az 18 U 69/16, or because of multiple deliberate legal infractions according to § 339 Penal Code to court of appeal

of Düsseldorf Az 18 U 69/16 (appeal against the regional court of Düsseldorf judgment of 11 May 2016 Az 2b o 271/01

and of court of appeal of Düsseldorf in judgment of 18/10/2017) or because of several violations of law (eg* Art. 101 GG,

Art. 103 GG, § 48 ZPO) etc. (*eg = exempli gratia = for example)

such as

against the regional court of Düsseldorf judges of the 2b Civil Chamber Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Gundlach

because of multiple offenses according to § 331 Penal Code or because of multiple legal infractions according to § 339

Penal Code to Az 2b o 271/01 in the judgments of 11 May 2016 and 16 March 2011 or because of several violations (eg

Art. 101 GG, Art. 103 GG, Art.

Last modified on Friday, 04 October 2019 22:34

Visitors: Today 6 | Yesterday 21 | Week 189 | Month 620 | All 35554

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok Decline