Dr.-Ing. Th. SARTOROS

                                           -  2012 -  Teil 2 (από 30.5.12 εως 14.10.12)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

The Putsch-Club of 11 Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, invites and collaborates with accused Judge, Mr.  Schumacher, on case which concern him personally

 

The alarm system, of district-court, Düsseldorf/ Court of appeal,  Düsseldorf / Attorney General  / Superintendence of tax offices Düsseldorf, howl,

after specifying on 12.7.2012 the claims for compensation 1.779.197, - €,

 

The perfidious tactic of Mrs. Brecht on July 2012

to thrust aside the advocate Lasaroff

from process 2b o 271/01

 

 

The judicial battles of Advocate Lasaroff

against the Member of Putsch-Club, Mrs. Baan

 

The Judges of Putsch-Club of 11.Senat of Court of Appeal

give absolution to themselves for crimes punishable under § 339 StGB

 

Οι Πραξικοπηματίες 11. Συγκλ. Εφετείου δίνουν αθωωτικά Πιστοπoιητικά στον Εαυτόν τους

 

Putschisten des 11.Senats OLG-Düsseldorf erteilen Unschuldsbescheinigungen an sich selbst

 

Putschisti del 11. Senato della Corte d´appello Düsseldorf danno assoluzione a se stessi

 

The Judges of Putsch-Club of 11.Senat of Court of Appeal give absolution to themselves

 

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

     WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC 

 

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

         

On 30. May 2012 sent by the Greek Engineer new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, which directed against the decision 27.4.2012 of 11. Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az I-11 W 82/10 (LG-Düsseldorf-Az 2b o 143/08), signed by Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Weishaupt /Mr. Koewius.

 

The staff had rejected the arguments of reprimand dated 21.12.2011 and not allowed the Legal Protest, and determined the costs under the wrong paragraph § 97 ZPO.

 

The constitutional protest is also directed against the Decision from 21.12.2011 in OLG-Az 11 W 82/10, (LG-Düsseldorf-Az 2b o 143/08) of illegally synthesized staff (Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Wermeckes /Mr. Koewius), 11. Senate Appeals, Düsseldorf, with the participation of praetorian putsch-club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, whoever decided by his own 57 unlawful acts and exculpated himself, while approved as legitimate the illegalities of First Instance Judge Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Schims (apprentice) in the treatment of (LG-Az 2b o 143/08).

 

The Greek Engineer requested the abolishment of unlawful decisions of 11. Senate, and the approval of PKH.

 

On 1st June 2012, sent the Greek Engineer new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, directed against the decision 22.5.2012, of 18. Senate, in OLG-Az I-18 W 23/12, signed by Malsch / Haarmann / Mrs. Baan i.e. from Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member Mrs. Baan, accused for more than 60 miscarriages / chicanery / breaches the European and German law, with which decision rejected reprimand from 04/27/12 and not allowed Legal Protest, as also against the decision of 16.04.12 in OLG-Az  18 W 23/12, (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 172/08)

 

The staff of 18. Senate had rejected requested PKH for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 172/08 concerning the revealing of content of secret Account of Tax Office Mettmann, where registered  the plundered amounts and the payments of the plaintiff and of his spouse, as well as withholding taxes which the Tax Office had to return to Greek Engineer and his spouse.

 

Remark

 

Got Reader, scene and grabbing and cover system?

The Tax Office grabs / looters that which can, and defies the laws.

 

The Judges of district Court reject the request of Greek Engineer, that the Tax Office reveal all entries in the secret Account Identification Number, to not allow the Greek Engineer require higher compensation for the plundered, and the Court of Appeal covers the Judge of district Court saying that the Court decision was correct and proper.

 

But that the judgment of district court issued by an illegally synthesized staff, is shrugged. (Omertá).

 

The fact that Mrs. Baan is repeatedly excluded, because of the punishable acts, not interested the other two judges (Malsch/Haarmann).

 

They look just how to get rid of as soon as possible the case, not to whine the Head Ministry of Justice NRW.

 

On 1.6.12 the unfold Mrs. Strauch, employee of the General Public Prosecutor´s office, Düsseldorf, (but appeared as defense of accused judges!) gave new objection in case that runs in Appeal, OLG-Az 18 W 37/12 (LG-Az 2b o 265/11 concerning miscarriages / chicanery / laws infringements of Judges Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser, Mrs.  Hoffmann, Mrs. Tigges, Mrs. Schims, Mr. Schwarz, Mrs.  Brückner-Hoffmann in precedents matters LG-Az 2b o 143/08 and LG-Az 2b o 118/99, as well as the Putsch-Club-Members of court of appeal  Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes / Müller at OLG-Az I-11 W 41/09); she refers only to the prior illegal decisions of the district Court, which praises and claims that the application of the Greek Engineer is not thorough. Mrs. Strauch to support her claims refers to the judgment of the Court of Appeals Munich / Bavaria from 25.8.2011. No. Orig. 1497/2011 and concludes that the accused judges committed no offense and no judicial error.

 

 

But Mrs. Strauch avoids and does not name any crime, only generally and vaguely expressed

i.e. "Omertá" by order from above and she must obey.

 

On 2.6.12 raises the Greek Engineer Legal Blame in accordance with Paragraph § 321a ZPO against decision of 05.23.12 in OLG-Az 24 W 26/12 of court of appeal and seek the approval for the Legal Protest to the high civil court BGH.

 

New surprise on 5.June 2012 came from 2b civil chamber, district-Court Düsseldorf, which shall notify, the trial date that was set for the 20.6.2012 for the treatment of compensation for crimes of tax office no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 271 / 01 postponed for 31. October 2012.

 

Remark

 

From here on, the 2b civil chamber, district-Court, Düsseldorf, will play the same Violin-song i.e. just approaching the court date for hearing, will announce another postponement, of course without application of a lawyer. Simply, judges are not ready for new comedy.

 

On 11.6.2012 adopts a decision the 24th Senate Appeals, Dusseldorf, no. Orig. OLG-Az 24 W 26/12 (LG-Az 2b o 29/08) and rejects the reprimand from 2.6.12 against the decision of the same senate from 05.23.12 as unjustified and identifies the costs in accordance with wrong Paragraph § 97 ZPO.

 

On 14.June 2012, the chairman, Mr. Malsch, of 18. Senate, court of Appeal, addressed a letter to Greek Engineer and expresses the view that, unfairly complained the Greek Engineer why do not notify the 18. Senate also the “Az” of First Instance judgment. He writes:

 

“The Court of Appeal is not obliged by law to enter the “Az” of first instance judgment.

 

 

From verbal attacks it seems that, the Greek Engineer lost the overview of multiple protests addressed to the Court of appeal”.

 

In other words, the Court of Appeal performs.

 

"Dienst nach Vorschrift = Service Provision firmly anchored in the Regulation"

 

In other words, Mr. Malsch trying to persuade Greek Engineer not to raise multiple or simultaneous protests against court decisions, because the "Service line by Regulation attaches much less. "

 

The Putsch-Club of 11 Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, invites and collaborate with accused Judge Mr.  Schumacher

Ο Σύλλογος Πραξικοπηματιών 11^ης Συγκλήτου Εφετείου προσκαλεί σε συνεργασία τον νομικά ευνουχισμένον δικαστήν Κον Σουμαχερ

 

Der neue Putsch des OLG-11. Senats in Zusammenarbeit mit dem LG-Richter Schumacher

 

Nuovo putsch del 11.Senato di corte d´appello in collaborazione col Giudice Schumacher

 

The new Putsch-Club-Member of 11.Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, takes his place in staff, which decides on 14.6.2012 about pending reprimand, raised against the decision of 20.12.2011 in OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08 concerning the miscarriages of Judge and A….cleaner, Mr. Schumacher).

 

The new chairwoman of the 11.Senate, court of appeal, Mrs. Rotzheim called the accused Magistrate of district Court, Mr. Schumacher (i.e. the known "Legal castrated" Mr. Schumacher, who through the servicing for Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll has been promoted to chairman of a civil chamber of district Court) to participate in preparation of the decision 14.6.2012 Court of Appeal in a case which concerns him personally.

 

Consequently, the decision of 14.06.2012 not only bring the signatures  Mrs. Rotzheim / Mr. Schumacher VRiLG /Mr. Weishaupt  (VRiLG = Chairman of civil chamber, district court) but the tone and content of revenge of legal castrated, Mr. Schumacher. The reprimand and protests against the wrong Paragraph § 97 ZPO determining costs, rejected as unacceptable, because of alleged shortcomings and errors  (of reprimand), without specifying  what errors and deficiencies found in  reprimand or protest.

 

Note

 

Mr. Schumacher undersign with his title “VRiLG” and not as Judge of Court of Appeal.

 

The illegal OLG-staff, with the new Putsch-Club-Member, Mr. Schumacher, shed the court costs (in Decision 06.14.12) as usual in Greek Engineer.

 

On 15.6.2012 sent to the ECHR / Strasbourg / France for complete the current protest there, No. Orig. 10.924 / 11, the latest decisions of 29.5.12 of the Federal Constitutional Court with Az 2 BvR 678/11, with relation to Putsch-Club-Members, 11. Senate, Appeals, Düsseldorf no. Orig.

 

OLG-Az 11 W 39/09 (LG-Az 2b o 129/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 42/09 (LG-Az 2b o 172/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 43/09 (LG-Az 2b o 142/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 44/09 (LG-Az 2b o 145/08).

 

The Greek Engineer trying to persuade the European Court with evidence about the illegal Putsch of the three groups in total (8) eight Judges (of putsch-Club-Members) of court of appeal Düsseldorf, which were formed in Febr. / May 2010 in order to shut away the Greek Engineer from treatments, and because of the indifference of the Federal Constitutional Court to impose legitimacy.

 

The Controversy with 24. Senate, Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, for the determination of the court costs, continues in a new protest of Greek Engineer against the decision deter fixation Costs of 11.6.2012 on no. Orig. OLG-Az 24 W 26/12 (LG-Az 2b o 29/08)

 

On 21.6.2012 raises the Greek Engineer new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, which directed against the decision 11.6.2012 of 24. Senate, court of Appeal, Dusseldorf, OLG-Az I-24 W 26/12 (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 29 / 08), and asks to abolish the decision of the Senate Appeals 24. Düsseldorf defining pay the costs on the basis of the wrong Paragraph § 97 ZPO.

Remark

 

Probably resentful judges of the Federal Constitutional Court, advising the 24th Senate Appeals in folding, and see a miracle:

 

i.e. within one day came the answer of 24. Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf.

 

On 22.06.2012 issued by the 24th Senate Appeals supplementary decision in OLG-Az 24 W 26/12 and states that, costs 50, - € concern only Reprimand and refer to Regulation (KV-GKG 1700, Zöller ZPO § 321a RNr. 20) with the further explanation that, the charge is applied also to PKH process.

 

By counteracting 24.06.2012 at OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08) against the decision 14.6.2012 signed by Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Schumacher VRiLG / Mr. Weishaupt (i.e. Signed illegally by the Judge Mr. Schumacher) insists the Greek Engineer to reviewed the wrong paragraph for determining the costs, and refers to Paragraph § 118 ZPO, and asks correction from 11. Senate court of Appeal.

 

On 28. June 2012 sent the Greek Engineer new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, which directed against the decision of OLG-Az I-11 W 81/10 (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 170/08), signed by Mrs. Rotzheim / Schumacher VRiLG / Mr. Weishaupt, rejecting the reprimand from 9.1.2012 by the decision of illegally synthesized staff with "legal castrated Judge of district Court, Mr. Schumacher" and did not allow Legal Protest, and determined costs under the wrong paragraph § 97 ZPO; The protest is also directed against the decision of 20.12.2011 the OLG-Az 11 W 81/10, (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 170/08) of illegally synthesized staff (Mrs. Rotzheim / Mr. Wermeckes / Mr. Koewius), 11. Senate Appeals Düsseldorf, with the participation of praetorian-Putsch-Club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, whoever decided to be silent about his 57 punishable acts, and exculpated himself, while approved as legitimate the illegalities of Judge of district Court.

 

 

The Greek Engineer requested the abolishment of unlawful decisions of the Senate 11. Appeal and the adoption of PKH, for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 170/08.

 

The judicial battles of Advocate Lasaroff against the Member of Putsch-Club, Mrs. Baan

 

Νομικές Μάχες του Δικηγόρου Λαζάροφ με την πραξικοπηματία Εφέτη Κα Μπααν (Baan)

 

Rechtliche Auseinandersetzungen des RA Lasaroff mit dem Putsch-Club-Mitglied Fr. Baan

 

Le battaglie giuridiche del avvocato Lasaroff contro il membro del Putsch-Club, Signora Baan

 

 

On 9 July 2012 begins the hard fight of the entrusted lawyer Lasaroff with illegally synthesized 18. Senate Appeals Düsseldorf, where works as reporter the praetorian-Putsch-Club-Member,  Mrs. Baan, who bear accusations for more than 60 chicanery / miscarriages / breaches laws, all punishable acts under the German Criminal Code, Paragraph § 339 StGB, to 5 years imprisonment.

 

On 9.July 2012 adopt a decision, the illegally synthesized 18. Senate Appeals (Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan, i.e. with the praetorian-putsch-club-Member, Mrs. Baan) in Appeal OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 and reject the application to grant PKH, which requires the Greek Engineer, to overturn the decision of district Court, who issued by contumacy by an illegally synthesized civil chamber (Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hofmann/ Mrs.  Brecht) on 10.12.11, in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 268/01.

 

A new trick had implemented the court of Appeal 18. Senate (which had gone unnoticed by Greek Engineer) i.e. to make final decisions, bring the disputed value of Protest below the legal limit of 200, - € basis; accordingly to the identified dispute value is permitted or not permitted, Protest again a decision.

So when the disputed value is less than 200, - € not allowed protest and the decision is final, regardless by whom it has been issued.

 

 

The legal limit but was raised end of the year 2012, to 600, - €.

                            i.e. the amendments to the laws are always made in order to

                                        prosper (idlers!?) highly paid judges.

 

                the simple citizen who ignores the amendments, is without any chance 

 

On 9 July 2012 issued a decision 18. Senate Appeals Düsseldorf with their members Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan and rejects as inadmissible the Protest of 30.03.2012 against the decision of 19.03.2012 to OLG-Az 18 W 4/12 (2b o 170/08, Case Schumacher i.e. concerning the Legal castrated Judge Mr. Schumacher) on the ground, that the value of the judgment challenged decision is less than 200, - €  

 

So, the illegalities of 18.Senate (with his praetorian Putsch-Club-Member) and of staffs of district Court, all final!

Germany, with Judges of OLG-Düsseldorf, in Greatness of illegality. Responsible senior, are silent.

 

On 10. July 2012 issued decision 18. Senate Appeals, Düsseldorf, signed by Malsch/Weith/ Haarmann in no. Orig. Current OLG-Az 18 W 37/12 (LG-Az 2b o 265/11, concerning perversions of Justice on the part of Court Judge Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser, Mrs. Hoffmann, Mrs. Tigges, Mrs. Schims, Mr. Schwarz, Mrs. Brückner-Hoffmann, as well as on the part of praetorian putsch-club of 11. Senate court of Appeals Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes / Müller in OLG-Az I-11 W 41/09) and shall reject the immediate protest from 24.3.2012 against the first instance judgment from 15.03.2012, based on the laconic ground, that the first instance judgment is “correct and proper”.

 

And here the 18.Senate does not adopt a decision on legal costs to OLG-Az 18 W 37/12.

 

On 11.7.2012 issued a decision the 18. Senate Appeals Düsseldorf, undersigned Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan in OLG-Az 18 W 89/12 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01) and rejects the immediate protest from 14.11.2011 of Greek Engineer against the first instance decision because of illegally synthesized staff (Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht) of the 2b civil chamber adopted on 12.10.2011.

 

 

Here again praised the offending Judges of district Court (Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann) that HAVE ADOPTED decision “correct and proper”.

 

 

The illegally synthesized Staff of court of appeal composed with the praetorian-Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan avoids to deal with accusations of Greek Engineer, that Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll is blocked since 18.12.2002, based on the Law and Paragraph § 47 of the ZPO, exclusion requested due to bias, which has not heard yet.

Omertá, as mobsters.

 

The Compare is considered from some highly paid, as offensive, but no one dares to contradict or

 to terminate it.

 

By letter of chairman (Malsch), of 18.Senate Appeals, to authorized lawyers Lasaroff, in asking whether to continue the appeal in OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 although not adopted PKH for Appeal and gives two weeks deadline to answer.

 

On 12. July 2012 the authorized Attorney Lasaroff completes the action, pending by the district Court, Dusseldorf, no. Orig. 2b o 271/01 with 129 pages for the crimes of tax office  Mettmann, with which destroyed the business of Greek Engineer and requesting compensation 1.779.197, - €, plus additional pension, that Greek Engineer lost because of the seizures on the part of Tax Office for hypothetical tax evasion, and heralds further claims for compensation for the destroyed building and machinery, Factory in Greece. The Action LG-Az 2b o 271/01 can´t longer be drowned like a request of Greek Engineer by providing PKH.

 

The alarm system, of district-court Düsseldorf/ Court of appeal  Düsseldorf / Attorney General  / Superintendence of tax offices Düsseldorf, howl

Οι λάμπες Συναγερμού ανάβουν σε Πρωτοδικείο/Εφετείο/Γενική Εισαγγελία/ Επιθεώρηση Εφοριών

 

Die Allarmanlagen, beim Landgericht/Oberlandesgericht/Generalstaatsanwaltschaft/ OFD, heulen

 

Le sirene d´alarme, del tribunale regionale/Corte d´appello/Publico Ministero e di Finanza, urlano

 

On 17. June 2012 raises the Greek Engineer Legal Blame in accordance with Paragraph § 321a ZPO against the decision of 10.07.2012, signed by Malsch / Weith / Haarmann in OLG-Az 18 W 37/12 (LG-Az 2b o 265/11) and accuses the staff by deliberately erroneous application of law, (it is known that the judges are not responsible for possible consequences of erroneous decisions), and explains what omissions deliberately made, in order to justify the obstacles, put by the tax office Mettmann, to Greek Engineer to obstacle the exercise of his profession (of Engineer and Inventor), and by not work the factory in Greece.

 

The perfidious tactic of Mrs. Brecht to thrust aside the advocate

fromprocess 2bo 271/01

 

Το ύπουλο σχέδιο της Κα Brecht

δια την απομάκρυνση του Δικηγόρου από 2bo 271/01

 

Die hinterlistige Taktik der Fr. Brecht,

zur Entfernung des RA Lasaroff vom Prozess 2b o 271/01

 

L´ insidiosa tattica della Signora Brecht,

per allontanare l´avvocato dall processo 2b o 271/01

 

In July 2012, the young Mrs. Brecht of 2b civil chamber, who not yet booked a year of practice for the Court (i.e. is still an apprentice and nevertheless signed as Judge of district Court) must then prove to the chairwoman (Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll) that deserves to continue practicing the profession Judge of 2b civil chamber and sets implemented an insidious plan, but committed by phone not to get hard evidence.

 

On 18. July 2012, the guided young Judge, Mrs. Brecht, 2b civil chamber, district Court, called by phone  the authorized lawyers Lasaroff and directly and indirectly trying to convince him that the action LG-Az 2b o 271/01

for the crimes of the tax authorities, with demands for compensation 1.779.197, - € etc., has no prospect of success and pretends that the Application sent on 12.7.2012

 is "too late", and claims that had to be sent in April 2011.

 

Mrs. Brecht tries i.e. on the one hand to poison him psychologically, to intimidate and on the other hand to convince him not more represent the Greek Engineer,

wherefore will fail the treatment 2b o 271/01.

 

A similar crime did Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll in May 2008 when he called by phone the young lawyer Mr. Pelke and persuaded him to resign operative treatment 2b the 268/01, because the lawsuit would not have prospect of success.

 

The same crime repeated Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and keep off the lawyer Mr. Goumagias in Sept. 2008.

 

With same psychological tactic, Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, forced to demission, the advocate  Weidemann in March 2011, and the Lawyer Klöpper in Sept. 2011 from the treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01.

 

The psychological effort of Mrs. Brecht, on 18 July 2012, was not the first, but the scenario was the identical, as with the Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and other lawyers.

 

Both women (Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and Mrs. Brecht) desired to say following:

 

"Advocate, go away, so I could decide in 2b o 271/01 by contumacy, without going

into the substance of the claims and evidence"

 

It is also doubtless the indirect messages of Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and Mrs. Brecht to the respective authorized lawyers.

The Poison of the snakes of 2b civil chamber, district Court, Düsseldorf,

is by other plaintiffs well known

 

And then, they wonder why the ordinary citizen does not trust the courts of Germany.

(See, book of Federal Minister Norbert Blüm «EINSPRUCH")

 

The effort of directed/remote controlled, Mrs. Brecht, fails and 2b civil chamber and the 18. Senate Court of Appeal, develop fierce counterattack against the Greek Engineer and against the advocate in order to disappoint and to resign from the lawsuit.

 

They know that without an advocate i.e. if the Greek Engineer not represented by lawyer in hearings by Court, is his lawsuit Az 2b o 271/01 finished. Without a lawyer can thus the Kamarilla of 2b civil chamber to reject the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01 because of contumacy, without examination of the substance and could impose on Greek Engineer costs exceeding 60 thousand Euro, included the remuneration of the Lawyers.

 

The purpose of the Judge-Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and Mrs. Brecht then

the decision for "default (contumacy)"

Reader tired to read?

But now enter the struggle of  Greek Engineer in a new phase  

against judicial lawlessness in Germany.

 

Please make an interruption for short breath, and continue to read what hardships and hazardous situations lived Greek Engineer, after July 2012 and how many times tried the “German secret services” to help wrongdoer’s judges.

 

On 18.7.2012 unanimously decides 2^nd Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court with Mrs. Lübbe-Wolff / Huber / Mrs. Kessal-Wulf about protest Az 2 BvR 851/10, 2 BvR 901/10 and Protest Az 2 BvR 1631/10 and does not introduce any protest by the committee responsible and send all to archive.

 

The above mentioned Protests concerning the Putsch-Club-Members of the three groups of court of appeal, Düsseldorf, where decisions taken in the

 

• > OLG-Az 11 W 54/09 (LG-Az 2b o 118/99) of 12.05.2010, 31.03.2010, 30.03.2010, 22.02.2010 , 18.2.2010, 16.2.2010, 23.9.2009,
• > OLG-Az 11 W 46/09 (LG-Az 2b o 29/08) of 12.05.2010, 31.03.2010, 30.03.2010, 22.02.2010, 18.2.2010, 16.02.2010, 23.9.2009, and
• > OLG-Az 12.5.2010 in OLG-Az 11 W 49/09 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08 concerning the Mr. Schumacher)

 

Got reader;

That denounced against Magistrates Court and Appeals Court buries the Federal Constitutional Court and the wrongdoer´s judges and appellate swim in the surface like corks.

 

The failed attempt, on 18.7.2012, of Mrs. Brecht to convince the lawyers to keep off from the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01, push her to make a new efforts on 19. July 2012, to discourage the Greek Engineer.

 

She sends letter of 19/7/2012 to Greek Engineer, in which exposes the view (Reader note the detail, does not issue a decision, but exposes the view) that the requests presented by the Attorney Application by 12.7.2012 at LG-Az 2b o 271/01 are similarly positioned/formulated (= "gleichgelagert") with the claims set by Greek Engineer in application dated 15.6.2011 to grant PKH in LG-Az 2b o 271/01, and therefore “did not have legal cover” (Mangel des Rechtschutz-bedürfnisses = not have legitimate interest to take legal action) and the requests of lawyers is unacceptable. The venom of Mrs. Brecht not spent.

 

On 19.7.2012 issued a decision (ECHR) European court in protest no. 74.300 / 10 (related to the excessive duration of treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01) and rejects it as inadmissible on the ground that since 2.11.2011 introduced a new Law in Germany, embedded in the Law on Courts Operation (GVG), with which the citizen is obliged to exhaust all levels of Justice before applying to the ECHR and in protest they have not been exhausted.

 

On 19.7.2012 the ECHR issued a decision European court in protest no. 33.988 / 10 (related to the excessive duration of treatment 2b o 268/01) and rejects it as inadmissible on the ground that that since 2.11.2011 introduced a new Law in Germany, embedded in the Law on Courts Operation (GVG), with which the citizen is obliged to exhaust all levels of Justice before applying to the ECHR and in protest they have not been exhausted.

 

The Attorney Tegebauer, who represents the Greek Engineer by ECHR, react quickly, reminding the judge, that the protests Number 33.988 / 10 and 74.300 / 10 were raised in 2010, when there was no such law in Germany, and therefore had to introduce the protest in process on the substance, but the European court tired of the hundreds of complaints that must be read each year, rejects the opinion of Attorney. So stop, and lost two years of waiting and the expenses.

 

On 23. July. 2012 Greek Engineer raise reprimand in accordance with Paragraph § 321a ZPO against a decision of the Court of Appeal 07.11.2012, OLG-Az 18 W 89/11 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01) signed by Malsch / Weith / Fr. Baan and displays the arguments that the Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan, is under the law and Paragraph § 47 ZPO excluded from decisions, requesting abolishment of the decision of illegally synthesized staff, and invoked paragraphs of the German Constitution.

 

On 25/07/12 answered the lawyer Lasaroff to the 18.Senate that the appeal OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 will continue.

On 26. July 2012 the lawyer Lasaroff sends a written response to Mrs. Brecht, LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and referring on her call by phone on 18.7.2012, exposes that by applicable law and because of omissions in the decision of 16.3.2011 of 2b civil chamber, district Court, Düsseldorf, i.e. that has not expired the limit, no legal delay (simply because the Court in the judgment delivered, pronounced in absentia on the 16/3/2011, did not refer to the relevant paragraph of the ZPO), therefore his application sent on 12.7.2012 is punctual

 

On 26. July 2012 raises the lawyer Lasaroff direct protest against the decision of 18. Senate dated 9.7.2012 with Appeal Ref. OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01), of illegally synthesized staff, Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan, by turning down his application to grant PKH for the appeal.

 

 

Focus violations of procedural decisions of higher courts, on the part of Judges of district Court, Düsseldorf, in the adoption of judgment, of challenged decision, dated 16.3.2011

 

On 27. July 2012 answered Greek Engineer, to Mrs. Brecht in her letter dated 19.7.2012, and exposes by applicable law (which apparently Mrs. Brecht pretending to not know!!! ) that the new application to grant PKH dated 16.07.2012 is not identical with the precedent from 15.6.2011 at 2b o 271/01 and that the new data require a hearing.

 

On 29. July. 2012 sent to ECHR / Strasbourg / France, to the current protest there, No. Orig. 30.788 / 11, the latest decisions 29/05/2012 of Federal Constitutional Court BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 698/11 and Az 1 BvR 896 / 10 concerning the decisions of 23.9.2009, 16.2.2010, 18.2.2010, 22.2.2010, 30.3.2010, 31.3.2010, 12.5.2012 of Putsch-Club-Member (Mr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs.  Baan / Mr. Wermeckes / Mr. Dahm / Mrs. Grabensee) of 11.Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 11 W 40/09 (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 194/07)

 

The Greek Engineer tried to persuade the European Court, as well about the tangible evidence for the criminal acts of the 8 Members of putsch-club of 11.Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, as the indifference of Federal Constitutional Court, to impose the legitimacy.

 

On 2. August 2012 again writes 18. Senate, court of appeals, Dusseldorf, to Lawyer Lasaroff, that the 27/07/2012 presented direct protest against the rejection of 09/07/12 of request for PKH, been applied for the appeal OLG-Az 18 U 223/11, is unacceptable and that the “Legal Protest” not approved. The 18.Senate give one week deadline to reply whether to withdraw the immediate protest.

 

On 6.8.2012 shall act with the staff Malsch / Weith / Haarmann in action, no. Orig. OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12 and rejects the requested PKH.

 

 

The culpability for the 11-year delay in the trial of the action LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 118/99 they shed, as usual to Greek Engineer; the illegal efforts of the Judges of district Court and of Court of Appeal (and mean Mrs. Baan), to shut up the Greek Engineer as unfit for transactions,  are properly done.

 

By letter of 6.August 2012, of Mrs. Brecht to Greek Engineer, recalls that the Court of Appeal (18 Senate, Mrs. Baan) had already decided on 16.5.2012 to OLG-Az 18 W 38/12 (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 271 / 01 and rejected the immediate protest (with three rows!), but the Judicial folder is still in the Court of Appeal, and when she take him, then shall be decided about the new application from 16/07/2012 for PKH.

 

It shall be proved, that Mrs. Brecht lying, or pretending ignorance, and will undo herself the afore-mentioned alleged (see 24. Sept. 2012)

 

On 13. Aug. 2012 sends the lawyer Lasaroff to 18. Senate told, that brought immediate protest in OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 is permissible, because the Court of Appeal not pursued an audit proceedings on rights, but acted as a court of first instance and by law the instance decisions contested in the immediate protest.

 

On 15. August 2012 submitted by Greek Engineer new application to grant PKH, for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and completes and provides new evidence for the crimes of tax office Mettmann

 

On 17. Aug. 2012 direct protest lodged against the decision of 6.8.2012 of 18. Senate Appeals Malsch / Weith / Haarmann in action, no. Orig. OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12, in which it rejected the request for PKH.

 

On 20. August 2012 issued a decision the illegally synthesized staff Malsch / Weith /Mrs. Baan, 18. Senate (with the participation of Putsch-Club-Member,  Mrs. Baan, who stubbornly refuses and gives no official statement, as required by law Paragraph § 44 (3) ZPO, the relentless indictment of Greek Engineer) and warns lawyer Lasaroff, that it intends to reject the Appeal, according with Paragraph § 522, Nr. 2 ZPO, because the Senate is convinced, that the appeal has no prospect of success, the question is not Suitable for completion to the existing procedure, and that there isn´t appropriate one hearing. The arguments of the plaintiff are insufficient in order to review the decision of the Senate from 9.7.2012. The content of the justification relied on by the Senate to the reasons for the refusal of PKH, Immediate protest, is unacceptable. etc, etc. They give a deadline of two weeks to the plaintiff, Greek Engineer, decide whether to withdraw the Appeal.

 

Remark

Reader noticed please the detail:

 

"It is not appropriate one hearing"

 

i.e. the 18. Senate Appeals does not want, in any way, to allow the hearing, because there provided by law (§ 260 ZPO) completion and modify of false claims of precedent lawyer Dr. Plötzgen.

And with a complete or modify of requests the case returns to district Court by hearing and someone want to block the development.

 

           That is why, shifted the Putsch-Club-Member,  Mrs. Baan from 11. Senate to 18. Senate.

That is why Mrs. Baan gives no official statement on the indictment of Greek Engineer.

 

On 22. August 2012 the Greek Engineer reapplies for PKH for new treatment against Judges Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Prote / Mrs. Weitzel / Mrs. Keiser in Az 2b o 121/10, as also by the Court of Appeal, 11. and 18. Senate covering the irregularities of Judges First Instance (and get no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 146/12)

 

On 24. Aug. 2012 Greek Engineer reapplies for PKH for new treatment against the Düsseldorf Court Judge Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Prote / Mrs. Weitzel / Mrs. Keiser for illegalities in precedent case, Az 2b o 120/10, as also by infringements of laws and chicanery on the part of the Judge of court of Appeal  Malsch / Haarmann, 18. Senate in Az 2b o 120/10 and in Az 2b o 118/99 and receives no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 148/12

 

On 27. Aug. 2012 Greek Engineer reapplies for PKH by action against the judges of First Instance Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Strupp-Müller / Mrs. Stöve / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Tigges / Mrs. Schmidt / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Keiser / Mrs. Pietroschinsky / Mrs. Henkefend, by the wrongdoing, chicanery and punishable acts, committed in previous treatment LG-Az 2b o 154/08, as also against the Putsch-Club-Member of 11. Senate Appeals, Mr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs. Baan / Wermeckes / Müller / Dahm / Mrs. Grabensee in OLG-Az 11 W 38/09 (LG-Az 2b o 154/08), and against the judge of 18. Senate Appeals, Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, who covered the illegalities of Judges of First Instance and of Court of Appeal 11.Senate, in OLG-Az 18 W 65/10 (LG-Az 2b o 154/08) and receives LG-Az 2b o 149/12

On 27. Aug. 2012 staff Malsch / Weith / Haarmann, 18. Senate Appeals Düsseldorf rejects as unacceptable (= unzulässig) the immediate protest of 17.8.2012 brought in the treatment of OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12, against decision of 6.8.2012 and claims the direct protest is unacceptable, because it supposedly does not fulfill the conditions of Paragraph § 567 Abs.1 ZPO.

 

The staff reiterates, that immediate protest raised only against decisions of Magistrate of district Court but not against Court of Appeal decisions and indicates BGH judgment of 8.11.2004, Az II ZB 24/03 - published in the journal NJW-RR 2005, 294 ff.

The staff insists that § 41 Nr. 6 ZPO does not apply in connection with § 41 Nr. 7 ZPO and that the conditions of § 41 Nr. 7 ZPO are not satisfied. Further claims by the Senate, that the Greek Engineer not thoroughly explained the delay in hearing of the action LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and throwing culpability in Greek Engineer, who submitted frequently changed requests.

 

Legal explication

Paragraph § 41 ZPO had until the end of 2011 only (6) sub-paragraphs / verses.

A subparagraph Nr. 7 is later completed; naturally, the Judges does not admit errors in naming paragraphs.

 

 

On 30. Aug. 2012 Greek Engineer submit application for PKH for a new lawsuit, against the Magistrates of district Court Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Strupp-Müller / Mrs. Stöve / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Tigges / Mrs. Schmidt / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Keiser / Mrs. Pietroschinsky / Mrs. Henkefend, by the wrongdoing, chicanery and punishable acts committed in previous treatment no. LG-Az 2b o 145/08, as also against the Putsch-Club-Member of 11. Senate Appeals Mr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs. Baan / Wermeckes / Müller / Dahm / Mrs. Grabensee in OLG-Az 11 W 44/09 (LG-Az 2b o 154/08), and against the decision in OLG-Az 11 W 61/10 (LG-Az 2b o 145/08), as also against the Judges of 18. Senate, court of Appeal, Malsch / Stobbe / Weith which covered in OLG-Az 18 W 86/10 (LG-Az 2b o 145/08) the illegalities Judges of First-Instance and of Appeals 11. Senate, and receives LG-Az 2b o 151/12.

 

On 30.8.2012 issue a decision in OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08) Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Koewius /Mr. Weishaupt, 11. Senate Appeal and rejected the rebuttal from 24/6/2012 against the decision of 14/06/2012, as also rejects as inadmissible the request for exclusion of legal castrated Judge Schumacher. No more discussion.

 

Remark

 

The Putsch-Club of 11. Senate, who called, the legally castrated, Mr. Schumacher, judge of district-Court, Düsseldorf, to participate by the decision of Court of Appeal, in case regarding him personally, is final, writes the 11.Senate.

You wonder reader, for relevance or by the audacity of 11.Senate court of Appeal Düsseldorf?

 

On 1^st Sept. 2012 Greek Engineer remind the Fund of the Court to publish a list of the costs for the arising Protests in pending actions.

 

On 6. Sept. 2012 repeats the lawyer Lasaroff legal view, that the direct-protest against rejecting an application for PKH announced by Appeal in OLG-Az 18 U 223/11, is admissible and legitimate, and refers to another decision of the Federal Labour Court.

 

On 17. Sept. 2012 sent by Greek Engineer to the ECHR / Strasbourg / France in Nr .: 39.060 / 11 the new decisions of the Court of Appeal in OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08 case Schumacher) to ascertain the European judges of the insolence of Staff 11. Senate, court of Appeal Düsseldorf.

 

On 09.20.2012 the Greek Engineer reminds 2b civil chamber district-Court Düsseldorf to decide on the request dated 16.7.2012 about the requested PKH for the treatment of the LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and asks to be informed that the request for PKH is sent to the defendant. No reply from the Court until today.

 

On 24 Sept. 2012 Mrs. Brecht sends a letter to the lawyer Lasaroff and informs him that the request from 15.6.2011 to grant PKH, for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01, has not yet finally heard by the Appeal Court (18. Senate) because there is pending a legal reprimand and also pending the exclusion request (Putsch-Club-Member) of Mrs. Baan and heralds that will still take a long time until it receives the dossier by the Appeal Court.

 

 

It's like said to the lawyer "not to blame the 2b civil chamber for inactivity"

 

On this occasion, adjourn the hearing date set for 31.Okt. 2012

and sets new postponed hearing for 20/02/2013

 

It is already the second postponement of the hearing date for 2b o 271/01 on the grounds that the Court of Appeal found Folder.

 

Remark

 

Reader, do you know the legend by the Greek calends?  What does the court of appeal.

Difficult cases send them to the Greek calends i.e. to the "infinitely waiting"

 

24. On Sept. 12 the Greek Engineer addressed to the President of the district Court Düsseldorf and asks his intervention, as the Fund of the Court record on panel debts from protests.

 

 

And see miracle, the president answered within two days: he is not responsible.

 

The Justice Fund is the responsibility of the President of the “County Court” (not of district court).

 

On 26 Sept. 2012 issue a decision the illegally synthesized staff of 18. Senate, Appeals, Malsch / Weith /Mrs. Baan in OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 (concerning Appeal against the second decision of 10.12.11 in absentia LG-Az 2b o 268/01) and rejects as unacceptable the immediate protest from 27.7.2012 against the decision of 18.Senate from 09/07/2012, and argues with reference to BGH judgment of 27/06/2012 no. Orig. Az III ZB 45/12.

 

The decision of the BGH is about cut and sewn to the measures of 18. Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf

 

 

On 26. Sept. 2012 issue a decision the illegally synthesized staff, 18. Senate, Appeals, Malsch / Weith /Mrs. Baan, in OLG-Az 18 W 89/11 (LG-2b o 268/01) and rejects the request exclusion of Mrs. Baan by bias because of miscarriages of justice / quibble breaches the European and German law, etc., as unacceptable and also rejects Legal reprimand from 23/7/2012, 11/7/2012 against the decision of 18. Senate and the request for approval of the legal protest to BGH, as unacceptable.

 

In both these decisions 26. Sept. 2012 participates Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan and publishes

acquittal Certificate herself, as the Putsch-Club-Member Mr. Wermeckes 11. Senate Düsseldorf Court of Appeal.

 

All signatories Malsch / Weith conform to the newness Violation of law of Mrs. Baan, although it is prohibited by European and German Law to decide someone (like a judge) in Legal issues concerning him.

 

On 27. Sept. 2012 Greek Engineer sends per fax and postal letter to the 18.Senate, a Application (and requirement) that Mrs. Baan must perform an official declaration in accordance with the law and Paragraph § 44 (3) ZPO by categories, which are targeted against her and valid for the affairs

of 18. Senate No. Orig. OLG-Az 18 W 76/10, OLG-Az 18 W 33/12, OLG-Az 18 W 38/12 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01)

 

On 28 Sept. 2012 Greek Engineer sends per fax and postal letter to the 18.Senate,a Application (and requirement) that Mrs. Baan must perform an official declaration in accordance with the law and Paragraph § 44 (3) ZPO by categories which are targeted against her and to apply for the case  No. Orig. 18. Senate OLG-Az 18 U 223/11

 

Remark

 

There is evidence that evaluated show, that the two (2) decisions of 18. Senate Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan from 26/09/2012 were written after delivery of the two fax of Greek Engineer, calling for the exclusion of Mrs. Baan (and required) to Mrs. Baan to give according to the Law and Paragraph § 44 (3) ZPO “official statement” regarding the categories which charge her for perversion of justice and criminal acts, punishable according to the Law and Paragraph § 339 StGB German Criminal Code.

 

The 18. Senate has writes the pre-date, just in order to have the excuse, that the requests were received by the Court of appeal, when most had issued decisions and to avoid further complication.

 

The same method i.e. to put judgment date before receiving the letter from Greek Engineer had applied / exploited Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll  of district Court Düsseldorf in December 2002.

 

On 1. October 2012 raises the Greek Engineer new lawsuit, because of the miscarriages / chicanery / infringements of European and German Law, on behalf of Judges district Court, Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Köstner-Plümpe / Mrs. Tigges / Mrs. Schmidt / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mr Noltze, in precedent lawsuit, no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 194/07, and of judges (Kneist / Döhinghaus / Brügemann) of 4.Senate, court of Appeal, in protest. No. Orig. OLG-Az 4 W 30/10 (LG-Az 2b o 194/07).

 

On 4. October 2012 the ECHR issued a decision and dismissed as inadmissible the Protest Nos. 36.793 / 12 (which is directed against the legal Putsch-Club-Member, in LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and only signed by the German Reporter Müller-Elschner.

Judge Mrs. Keller has no time either to sign the decision and burial in the helper Court (ECHR) judges of court without obligation to sign decisions?

 

On 7. Oct. 2012 raises the Greek Engineer reprimand against the decision of 26.09.2012 in OLG-Az 18 W 89/11 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01) of illegally synthesized staff Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan, 18. Senate, Appeals, Düsseldorf and reiterates the request of exclusion of Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan, from all decisions.

 

On 10. October 2012 issued a decision (BVerfG) Federal Constitutional Court with Mrs. Lübbe-Wolf / Huber / Mrs. Kessal-Wulf and refuses to introduce a review procedure on the merits following the protests. 

• > 2 BvR 1195/12 which directed against the Court of Appeal decisions in OLG-Az 11 W 5/11, judgment of 20.04.2012, 17.02.2012, 21.12.2011, and against Magistrates of district Court no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 6/11

• > 2 BvR 1411/12 which is directed against the Court of Appeal decisions in OLG-Az 24 W 26/12, decision of 11.06.12 and 23.05.2012 and against Magistrates of district Court no. Orig. LG-Az 2b o 29/08)

 

Remark

 

The refusal of the (BVerfG) Federal-Constitutional-Court) to consider in fact the described illegalities of Judges of district court and Appeals Court, It means not only a green light for further infringements of laws, but preliminary approval of punishable acts committed by Judges.

 

On 10. October 2012 gives the young unfold employee by General Public Prosecutor´s office Düsseldorf, Mrs. Strauch, objection almost identically in 4 newer treatments of Greek Engineer notably in LG-Az 2b o 146/12, in LG-Az 2b o 148/12, in LG-Az 2b o 149 / 12, LG-Az 2b o 151/12 and creates conditions for a personal attack on the part of Greek Engineer and Physician Dr. Lutz, because she distorts the content and meaning of medical opinion written 11.3.2011.

 

On 14. Okt. 2012 protests the Greek Engineer by constitutional court, because of the refusal by the Court of Appeals, Düsseldorf, 18. Senate, to grant PKH for Appeal no. Orig. OLG-Az 18 U 223/11 and receives there in Doc. Ref. Az 2 BvR 2492/12

 

- 2012 - (από 2.1.2012 έως 29.5.2012) –

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

Judge, Mrs. Brecht, of 2b civil chamber, district court, Düsseldorf,

her training period and violation of Law in year 2012

 

The Opinion of High Civil Court (BGH) about impermissible Protests against

decision of Courts of Appeal, in PKH procedure

 

The General Public Prosecutor's Office, Düsseldorf, as defender of accused Judges

 

The errors of lazy employee of General Public Prosecutor´s office accepted from 

2b civil chamber District-Court, Düsseldorf, (Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs. Brecht)

and applied against the Greek Engineer

 

After the improper use of the legal title “judge of district court” Mr. Schwarz again in action together Judge Mrs. BRECHT and violation of Law GVG

 

The transfer of Mrs. Baan, Member of Praetorian-Putsch-Club of 11.Senate, to the 18.Senate of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf; Consequences, 34 perversion of Justice

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

         

The new year, 2012, starts with a (legal) Blame on 02.01.2012 of Greek Engineer according to

§ 321a ZPO against a decision of 21.12.2011, 11. Senate Mrs. Rotzheim / Koewius / Weishaupt to OLG-Az 11 W 5/11 and accusations towards the staff, that determine costs which may not be based on § 97 ZPO, but based on § 118 ZPO, because it is by PKH process, and the matter has been since 2001, but the Senate 11. (in its old or new composition) insists to apply the wrong Paragraph (motivated by revenge)

 

On 4.1.2012 shall act the 18.Senate, Court of appeal, with the Staff Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann in OLG-Az 18 W 87/10 (concerns the LG-Az 2b o 198/11) and rejects direct Protest dated 16.11.2011 against the first instance decision of 12.10.2011 of illegal Staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht, with the assertion that it was late, and after passing one month from the uptake of the decision.

 

About the Illegal Composition of 2b civil chamber writes not a word. "Omertá" of mobsters then.

On 5.1.2012 (Legal) Blame submitted pursuant to paragraph § 198 GVG because of the excessive duration of trial treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and thus warned the judges for what is to follow.

 

On 01.08.2012 (Legal) Blame submitted pursuant to § 321a ZPO against the decision of 21.12.2011 of Praetorian Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Wermeckes /Mr. Koewius in OLG-Az 11 W 82/10 (LG-Az 2b o 143/08) with peaks against the Putsch-Club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, who does not mean to disappear from the horizon of the Greek Engineer.

                        

On 09.01.2012 (Legal) Blame submitted pursuant to § 321a ZPO against the decision of 21.12.2011 of Praetorian Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Wermeckes /Mr. Koewius in OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08) with peaks against the Putsch-Club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, who does not mean to disappear from the horizon.

 

With reprimand of Greek Engineer dated 09.01.2012 against the decision of the 18.Senate Court of appeal,   Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann from 4.1.2012 to OLG-Az 18 W 87/10 (LG-Az 2b o 198/11 Düsseldorf, separated from LG-Az 2b o 268/01) the Greek Engineer trying to convince the staff that immediate protest was submitted in time (because the decision had been served on 17.10.2011), and did not rule out fraud within the Court.

 

On 10.1.2012 the Greek Engineer addressed to the President of the District-Court in Düsseldorf and asks him to clarify, when it acquired the legal title Judge of district Court the following named:

 

Mrs. Fuhr, Mr.  Schwarz, Mrs. Schmidt-Kötters, Mrs. Schuster, Mrs. Schims, Mrs. Fudickar, Mrs. Schumacher, Mrs. Pietroschinsky, but the President understands that Greek Engineer something is cooking against named Persons, and in 13.1.2012 rejects the request, on the grounds, that regarding personal date and is inviolable.

 

But the Greek Engineer persists and requests on 19.1.2012 to sent photocopy from publications within the Journal/Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice, when hired and when receiving the legalization Judge of District-Court, the above named. The President of the District-Court never replied.

 

On 18.January 2012 submitted by the advocate Lasaroff the appeal, initially justification by submitting a request for approval PKH (for appeal) in Az 18 U 223/11; The appeal is directed against 2^nd Decision of 12.10.2011 because of contumacy, in LG-Az 2b o 268 / 01, and also thoroughly explains the relationship of the infringements against applicable laws and regulations of the Judge District-Court, in issuing unlawful decision.

 

The Court of Appeal is now obliged to first decide over the application by providing PKH, before it entered in the hearing procedure of the appeal.

 

On 23.1.2012 submitted an application to grant PKH for lawsuit according to § 198 GVG for damages on account of the excessive duration of 13 years of treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99 (which has not finished yet) and receives no. Protocol Az I-18 SchH 3/12, 18. Senate, Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf.

 

On 23.1.2012 completed the Protest of 29.6.2011 to the ECHR (Nr. 47.477 / 11) with senior decision (OLG) and maximum (BGH / BVerfG) German courts, grouped in seven cases, with a declaration that is exhausted all legal proceedings in the GFR.

 

With new decision of 25.1.2012, of Staff Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, 18. Senate Court of appeal,  Dusseldorf,  OLG-Az 18 W 71/10 (LG-Az 2b o 118/99) is rejected as unjustified direct protest against the first instance judgment of 12.7.2010 (in which the illegal staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Weitzel had rejected the requested PKH  for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99).

 

Here lie impudently the appellate Malsch / Haarmann / Weith arguing that on 12.7.2010 had indeed barred the claims for compensation, contained in the LG-Az 2b o 118/99, because of illegal tax notices of the tax authorities Mettmann-Düsseldorf, and ignore / silence by the evidence provided on the tax return in December 2006, payments which interrupt the limitation period etc.

 

The staff Malsch / Haarmann / Weith try to justify falsehood with reference to paragraph § 204 Abs. 1 Nr. 14 (BGB) Civil Code, (which does entered into force after subjecting the treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and therefore not apply where the LG-Az 2b o 118/99. The Greek Engineer must also known something such details, which ignore even lawyers, to confront the wrongdoers Judges of court of appeal.

 

Note

Malsch decision of 25.1.2012 refers on § 204 BGB (new version) entered in Force 1.1.2002, but he accepted that BGB (old version), there is applicable

 

With the same falsehood by changing the text and mean of § 209 BGB (old version), shall try Mr. Malsch, on 3. Sept. 2015, to reject the claims for compensation because of the crime of Tax office

In treatment 2b o 271/01.

 

Got reader? what tricks and violation of Law try the judges of Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, to prevent any success of the Greek Engineer, without seems wrong in his argument.

 

Judges are not responsible for the (intentional) mistakes?.

 

With new decision on 25.Jan. 2012, Staff Malsch / Haarmann / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 65/10 (LG-Az 2b o 154/08 concerning irregularities of Judges of first instance and of  judges of the Court of Appeal, and among them, Mr. Malsch and Mr. Haarmann, committed in the period 2000-2008) rejected with two rows justification, the legal rebuttals from 7.2.2011 against the decision of 3.2.2011 of the same staff, because of the Perversion of Justice by the defendants.

 

They also not approve the “Legal Protest” to BGH, against the decision.

 

That Mr. Malsch and Mr. Haarmann are excluded to participate in the committee shall be oppress.  OMERTÁ of mobsters then.

 

On 26.1.2012 the Greek Engineer launches new application to grant PKH for action (LG-Az 2b o 23/12) on basis of paragraph § 839 (BGB) Civil Code and requests to condemn the employer of Judge Mrs. Stöve, Mrs. Fuhr, Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Huth, Mrs. Schuster, for offenses against the laws and Perversion of Justice, conducted in treatments LG-Az 2b o 250/03 and in LG-Az 2b o 118/99, as also by the wrongdoing of Court of appeal  11. Senate Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Müller at OLG-Az 11 W 17/05, and Judges of 18.Senate, court of appeal,  Malsch / Haarmann in OLG-Az 18 W16 / 04, where committed deliberately offenses under the § 339 StGB.

 

The Opinion of the High Civil Court (BGH) about impermissible in Protests

against decision of Courts of Appeal, in PKH procedure

 

Der Bundesgerichthof (BGH) und die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerden

gegen OLG-Beschlüsse in PKH-Verfahren

 

On 26 January 2012 the headquarters Schlick / Dörr / Herrmann / Hucke / Tombrink with Vice-president of BGH, Mr. Schlick, adopt a decision in Az III ZV 79/11 and III ZA 80/11 concerning applications to grant PKH by one NZB against decisions of 25.7.2011 and 24.11.2011 Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, with the following content:

 

"The application to grant PKH by subjecting the “Legal Protest”, is rejected because the intended legal effect does not have sufficient prospects of success. Against decision of the Court of Appeal,

is the appeal of “Legal protest”, unacceptable, because it is not provided by the law and neither has approved the Appeal Court (§ 574 Section 1, ZPO); The decision from 24.11.2011 of the Court of Appeal, with which the reprimand was rejected, is final, in accordance with paragraph § 321a, paragraph 4, Phrase 4 ZPO ".

 

The General Prosecutor's Office as defender  of accused Judges

Η Γενική Εισαγγελία σαν Δικηγόρος Υπεράσπισης των παρανομούντων Δικαστών

Der Generalstaatsanwalt verteidigt wie ein Rechtsanwalt, die Straftäter in Richtertalar

 

On 27.1.2012 gives to Az 2 FP4 / 12, Repulsion of the General Attorney, Düsseldorf in LG-Az 2b o 244/11, signature Mr. Weber, and pretends that the request to grant PKH is inadmissible and that the desired action has no prospect of success.

 

On 30.1.2012 shall act with the staff Malsch / Stobbe / Weith Court of Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 18 W 9/12 (LG-Az 2b o 143/08), with which rejects immediate Protest against the first instance decision of 12.10.2009 to (LG-Az 2b o 143/08) and justify with 2 rows, that the contested decision of illegally synthesized staff 2b civil chamber (Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Dr. Hoffmann / Mrs. Dr. Schims) is correct and proper.

 

About the infringement of paragraph 75 GVG and Article 101 GG of the Constitution did not write a single word. OMERTA then, like the mafia.

 

On 30. January 2012 unleashes the Greek Engineer new application to grant PKH (LG-Az 2b o 22/12) for treatment with compensation claims, because of violations of law, violation of Constitutional Rights, on behalf of Judge District-Court Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser, Mrs. Hoffmann, Ms. Pietroschinsky, within the former treatment LG-Az 2b o 203/09, and by the Court of appeal  Judges Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs. Baan / Müller und Malsch, carried out in protests OLG-Az I-11 W 19/10, OLG-Az I-11 W 55/10, OLG-Az I-11 W 7/11 und OLG-Az I- 18 W 16/11.

 

On 2. Febr. 2012 adopts a decision BGH in Az III ZB 37/11 signed by Schlick / Hucke (concerns the OLG-11 W 12/11, decision of 28.11.2011) on the ground:

 

"The Blame of the Plaintiff addressed at the Court of Appeal against decision enounced in the OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 rejected; the decision is final in accordance with § 321a, Section 4, leap 4, ZPO"

On 2. Febr. 2012 Vice-president of BGH, Mr. Schlick, sends a letter to the Greek Engineer in

Az III ZB 37/11 with the following content:

 

"You have resubmitted in this case request to grant PKH by one NZB against a decision of the Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, on the motive, that your reprimand against the decision was rejected (by the Court of Appeal).

 

You submitted in the past many similar requests or protests. In III Senate submitted 15 such protests and all failed. Of all these cases it is very well known, that in such cases Law not provide

 for an appeal to the BGH.

 

The Senates decided parallel to the decision III ZA 37/11 not to issue any more in future decisions about (unacceptable) protests, against Court of Appeal decisions. "

 

In that letter of the Vice-president Mr. Schlick replied the Greek Engineer on 14.2.2012 (in the III ZA 37/11 concerns the OLG- Az 11 W 12/11, LG-Az 2b o 271/01 Düsseldorf) focusing: deficiencies in procedure PKH, and with the suggestion to consolidate the “Legal Protest” and procedure, and especially to grant PKH in cases, where accusations by chicanery, perversion of  justice, charge the appellate judges, and finally not requiring the approval  of the accused judges to submit Legal Protest” to BGH.

But the letter remained unanswered, like a “cry for help in the wilderness”. (see text in German, click BGH)

 

On 6. Febr. 2012 submitted to the ECHR (EGMR) protest Nr. 10 714/12 against the decision of the BGH III ZB 79/11 concerns the OLG-Az 18 W 13/11, Dusseldorf, i.e. regarding case District-Court

LG-Az 2b o 177/10.

 

After the improper use of the legal title “judge of district court”

Mr. Schwarz again in action, together Mrs. BRECHT and Violation of Law GVG

 

Nach Missbrauch des gesetzlich geschützten Titels „Richter am LG“ Herr Schwarz in Aktion, zusammen mit Fr. Brecht, und Verletzung der GVG

 

Dopo l´abuso del legale Titolo „Giudice del tribunale regionale“ Sign. Schwarz in azione insieme colla Signora Brecht e la violazione della legge GVG

 

Μετά από κατάχρηση του κατοχυρωμένου τίτλου „Δικαστής Πρωτοδικείου“

Ο Κύριος Σβαρτς επιστρέφει, και μαζί με την Κα Μπρεχτ διαπράττει παραβάσεις κατά του νόμου GVG

 

On 7.2.2012 became bold the District-Court Judges Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht together with former abuser's of legal/regulated title Judge of district-Court, Mr. Schwarz, issued a decision in LG-Az 2b o23/12 and reject the request from 26.1.2012 to grant PKH, as unjustified.

 

On 8.2.2012 the illegally (contrary of GVG) synthesized staff of district-Court Schwarz / Fröml / Mrs. Brecht rejects as unacceptable (inadmissible),

on the one hand, the request by 12-12-2011 to grant PKH for the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 244/11 concerning the procedural irregularities of former Chairwoman Tannert and of A....cleaner and defrauder Mrs. Wolks-Falter and

on the other hand, the demand for compensation for mental anguish because of abuses etc, of Articles Constitution by Mrs. Fuhr / Mrs. Schmidt-Kötters / Mrs. Stöve and Schumacher in LG-Az 2b o118/99 on the ground that, supposedly already judged the same requests in LG-Az 2b o146/03 and in LG-Az 2b o250/03, and therefore supposedly is valid the precedent judgment, and shut out a new decision by PKH. 

Moreover the treatment is allegedly inadmissible because the object of treatment supposedly not sufficiently specified.

 

The total request, allegedly, unresponsive, does not equal to the sum of individual claims for damages. The lawsuit is supposedly also unjustified because it not shows that the Judges violated rules under Article 839, Number 1, BGB in conjunction with Article 34 of the Constitution, and therefore can’t be justified the request for compensation for mental anguish under attack personal data and personality. At this point makes reference to the arguments from 27.01.2012 Pg. 3 et seq. of the Attorney General, which the Senate accepted completely.

Note
Court-Decisions failed in PKH-Procedure, not shut out the possibility to repeat the question to grant PKH in the same case, if the object completed with new arguments or with new formulated claims

 

On 8.2.2012 the illegally (contrary of GVG) synthesized staff Mr. Schwarz /Mr. Fröml / Mrs. Brecht of district-Court, rejected as unjustified, the request from 30.01.2012 to grant PKH by LG-Az 2b o 22/12.

 

Also in this case, supposedly, is valid precedent requests submitted and judged into LG-Az 2b o203/09. Moreover the demands for the treatment of by 30.1.2012 are not sufficiently justified.

 

Moreover, the judges have not infringed any Rule or Regulation within the frame of § 839, Number 1, BGB in combination with article 34 GG Constitution and therefore there is rejected the request for compensation for mental anguish. The mentioned staff decided that, the accused staff was illegally synthesized, is not justified, and its decision to reject the requested exclusion of Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, is adopted in accordance with the currently applicable regulations.

 

Got reader? judges who trampled on the laws and proved accusations through Documents, are not recognized by the staff of A....cleaner, and discarded. The Errors of lazy employee of General Prosecutor´s Office, Düsseldorf are accepted and used against the Greek Engineer.

 

The errors of lazy employee of General Public Prosecutor´s office accepted from 2b civil chamber and used against the Greek Engineer.

 

One hand (= District-Court) wash the other (=Attorney General)

and both the face (=Justice) (Greek proverb).

 

On 10. Febr. 2012 submitted (14 Pages) (legal) Blame (reprimand according § 321a ZPO) against decision dated 25.1.2012 of Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, in  OLG-Az 18 W 71/10 (LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and specified the deficiencies in PKH process and requested the approval for “Legal Protest”.

 

On 13. Febr. 2012 submitted (2 Pages) (legal) Blame (reprimand according § 321a ZPO) against decision of 30.1.2012 of Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, in OLG-Az 18 W 9/12 (LG-Az 2b o 143/08) and specified the deficiencies in PKH process and requested the approval for “Legal Protest”.

 

With “laconic decision in two rows” dated 13.2.2012, rejected by Court of appeal, Staff, Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann, the immediate protest from 23.10.2009 against the decision of 12.10.2009 in LG-Az 2b o 170/08 raised  04. Aug. 2008 (involves wrongdoing of Schumacher / Mrs. Schuster in LG-Az 2b o 271/01) "The judgment is right and proper" write the wrongdoers of 18.Senate court of Appeal Düsseldorf.

Note

 

The constitutional court obliges all the courts to justify sufficiently the decision and refer to the more important evidence. For the 18.Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, is mentioned rule not valid!

 

On 13.2.2012 shall decide the headquarters Malsch / Stobbe /Haarmann in OLG-Az 18 W 87/11 (LG-Az 2b o198/11, separated from LG-Az 2b o268/01) and rejects the reprimand from 9.1.2012 against the decision of same staff dated 4.1.2012 to OLG-Az 18 W 87/11 as unjustified. They pretend that the applicant's right to be heard, was maintained.

 

The staff also explains for the first time, with reference to paragraph § 222, Section 2, ZPO, that the statutory period specified, shall commence on the day of performance, independently whether this (performance day) is Saturday or a Sunday or other public holiday (§ 187 BGB) .

 

The above decision contradicts the Greek Engineer on 2.18.2012 claiming that demonstrated by the Judiciary Folder, the infringement against Article 103 the Constitution.

 

New defiant decision on 17.2.2012 by determining the costs on the base of requirements in LG-Az 2b o 198/11 by illegally synthesized 2b civil chamber Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht, which forces the Greek Engineer to repulse with immediate protest, because the aforementioned lawsuit should carried out only if the requested PKH was approved, and that in PKH process the district Court not issued decisions by determining costs. The matter already employs BGH.

 

Note

 

Reader, note please the presence of Mrs. Brecht in the illegal staff, of 2b civil chamber, district court, Düsseldorf, by defiant decisions; she must learn from the other two judges the method of infringement of law, in purpose to apply that in later decisions, as single Judge. That is called “training period”

 

With immediate protest from 18.02.2012 against the decision of 8.2.2012 of illegal Staff Schwarz / Fröml / Mrs. Brecht, First Instance, in LG-Az 2b o244/11, submitted also an application for annulment of the decision, with which was rejected the requested PKH on 12.12.2011 for those treatment.

 

With direct Protest dated 20.2.2012 against decision of 8.2.2012 of illegal Staff Schwarz / Fröml / Mrs. Brecht, First Instance, in LG-Az 2b o22/12, submitted also an application for annulment of the decision, with which was rejected the requested PKH on 30.1.2012 for those treatment.

 

On 21. Febr. 2012 submitted (legal) Blame (reprimand according § 321a ZPO) against the decision of 13.2.2012 of Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 4/12 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08), shortages focus on procedure PKH, infringements of Article 3 GG and Article 6 EKMR (= European Declaration of Human Rights) and request approval of “Legal Protest”.

 

A multipage Constitutional Protest (Az 2 BvR 471/12) sent on 22.2.2012 to the BVerfG, and focus breaches of Articles Constitution on behalf of Judges Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, Court of Appeal of Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az I-18 W 65/10 within the decision of 25.1.2012, and the Greek Engineer applying for a annulment and approval of PKH for the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 154/08.

 

Note

The decision of staff Malsch/Haarmann/Weith is unlawfulness, because undersigned Malsch/Haarmann. The two judges are accused in the lawsuit 2b o 154/08 because of distortion of justice and penal acts, punishable by § 339 StGB penal code. It was prohibited to them to participate and formulate the decision on 21.2.2012, but the law is not valid for the entitled “RECELEUR = fence” Mr. Malsch.

 

Note: on 10.10.2012 the BVerfG HAVE ADOPTED decision by three juxtaposed Constitutional  Protest, and among them the Az 2 BvR 471/12

The designation "lazy" for the highly paid of the General Public Prosecutor´s office, Dusseldorf, it may seem to some as excessive. Therefore they need proof; The employee, young lady (with camellias?) named Mrs. Strauch, present the file (Objection) by 22.2.2012, which is copied from another file (Objection) of another colleague, who again had patched former text.

 

All 3 parroting legal terms, which largely ignore the significance and do not match to the object of the case, LG-Az 2b o265/11. The text Protocol Number Az 2 FP 8/12 of General Prosecutor sent it as a rebuttal to a request from 22.12.2011 to grant PKH Case LG-Az 2b o265/11.

 

The new defender (Mrs. Strauch) of accused judges, writes that, “Of course, the Judge of district court did not commit any crime nor infringed rules of international law subjecting the July / August 2008 Secrets requests to the guardianship court of City Essen.

 

Reader not ask me, how Mrs. Strauch obtained her doctorate and how hired in the general Public Prosecutor´s Office, Dusseldorf. However Vitamin B Edit key role in both cases.

 

On 24. Febr. PKH 2012 the Greek Engineer submitted application to grant PKH for one NZB against the decision issued  25.1.2012 in Az I-18 W 65/10 of staff Malsch / Haarmann / Weith, Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf (concerning LG-Az 2b o154/08), with which the staff rejected the Blame and not allowed “Legal Protest”.

 

On 27. Febr. 2012 immediate Protest submitted in the LG-Az 2b o23/12 against the decision 7.2.2012 of illegally synthesized Staff Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht / Mr. Schwarz, and repulsed the claims of the staff that the requests were put in another lawsuit and had heard.

 

The staff is asked and “challenged to show specifically” at what other treatment they had put the same demands and when judged.

 

And the challenge was: if they do not prove, than is the assertion false / whimsical and therefore shall be approved the requested PKH for LG-Az 2b o23/12.

 

On 28.2.2012 sends new rebuttal in LG-Az 2b o238/11 no. Protocol 2 FP 9/12 the unfold Ms. Strauch from the general Public Prosecutor´s office and claims, that the same demands repeats Greek Engineer in Az 2b o 244/11.

 

Of course, the Judge did not commit any crime nor infringed rules of international law subjecting the July / August 2008 Secrets requests to the guardianship court of City Essen, write the Parrots.

 

On 29.2.2012 issued a decision the illegally synthesized Staff, 11. Senate Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Baan / Koewius, Court of appeal , with the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan, to OLG-Az 11 W 83/10 (LG-Az 2b o172/08) and repeats the arrogant claims, that the blame does not meet the formal requirements (without naming them).

 

The arrogance of the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member, Ms. Baan, is shown by the indicated claim that the reprimand (§ 321a ZPO) can´t be justified by an infringement of Article 103 of the Constitution, nor in contravention of paragraph § 47 ZPO.

 

Got Reader? What doing, or what proclaim the parroting, the citizen shall accept them,

But not the same rule is valid for the accused, who enjoy their high salaries.

 

The laws do not apply to those wrongdoers judges ?, only by the plain language a citizen apply ?.

 

On 02. March 2012 sent by Greek Engineer one Statement of defense (Remonstration) in OLG-Az 11 W 5/11 with extensive description of the shortcomings and loopholes in legislation and in decisions of Courts “regarding the Reprimand and Legal Protest in PKH procedure” and indicate to 11.Senate, in connection with incorrect determination costs, that PKH Process costs are determined in accordance with paragraph § 118 ZPO (see Zöller, ZPO, 28. edition, § 91, Rn. 13);

 

By immediate Protest from 04.03.2012 repel the Greek Engineer the decision of First-Instance dated 22.2.2012 of illegal staff Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll /Mrs. Hoffmann /Mrs. Brecht on costs in the LG-Az 2b o198/11 (which had separated from the LG-Az 2b o118/99) on the ground, the mentioned staff is illegally synthesized, because the exclusion requests have not heard, that in PKH process  is not allowed to issued such decisions, and the complementary decision which defines costs for Protest based on 349,65 € is incorrect, because it does not allow the integration of expenses from protest to court of Appeal to that costs of first instance arose during the PKH procedure.

 

The issue facing the Judge Mrs. Brecht and writes to Greek Engineer that she intends to withdraw the decision of 22.2.2012 and sends a letter to the Adversary (NRW-OFD) for update and opinion.

 

Note: the unsafe behavior of the judge in training, Mrs. Brecht, who pretends to impose false sentence

 

On 03.04.2012 adopt a decision in LG-Az 2b o172/08 as usual the staff illegally synthesized Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht, rejecting direct Protest and sends for judgment by the Court of Appeal.

 

On 7.3.2012 disregarded the views (of lazy employee) of General Public Prosecutor´s office, Dusseldorf, which expressed on 22.2.2010 by unfold young employee Mrs. Strauch in LG-Az 2b o2b o 265/11, case regarding a demand for granting PKH for the treatment dated 25.12.2011, due to illegalities and perversion of justice, committed by the Judge of 2b civil chamber, district court, Düsseldorf,  Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser, Mrs. Hoffmann, Mrs. Tigges, Mrs. Schims, Mr.  Schwarz, Mrs. Brückner-Hoffmann, as well as the excesses of Court of appeal,  11. Senate, Dr. Bünten /Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes / Müller in OLG-Az I-11 W 41/09 (LG-Az 2b o 143/08).

 

The Greek Engineer explains that wrongdoers Judges of court of appeal committed 14 times the same transgressions (violations of laws and violations of constitutional rights) and the Greek Engineer is therefore entitled to claim 14 times the compensation for mental suffering etc.

 

The controversy with the praetorians Putsch-Club, notably with Mrs. Baan, continues; submitted by Greek Engineer a Remonstration on 14.3.2012 against the judgment of 29.2.2012 in OLG-Az 11 W 83/10 signed by Mrs. Rotzheim /Mrs. Baan /Mr. Koewius, with which shall be submitted also a rebuke against the rejection of direct protest, and explained the shortcomings and gaps in legislation regarding the Legal Protest in PKH procedure.  Further focus the intentional error to-appointment costs protest based on the wrong paragraph § 97 ZPO.

 

As if that was not enough grades for wrongdoing, against the former A....cleaner of Mrs. Tannert, Judge Schumacher, a new illegal staff (Mr. Schwarz / Mrs. Schumacher/ Mrs. Brecht) chaired by Mr. Schwarz (former abuser of patented Title "Judge of district-Court ") and with participation of young ladies Schumacher (relation by lineal descent of the legally castrated A…Cleaner Judge Schumacher), adopt a decision on 14.3.2012 in LG-Az 2b o244/11 and rejects immediate Protest on the ground that Mr. Schwarz has already exempted by the Court of Appeal (as alleged paragraph § 41 ZPO does not apply), and that none constitutional right of Greek Engineer is wounded and sends for further judgment to the Court of Appeal.

 

On individual day 14.3.2012 shall act the same illegal staff Schwarz / Mrs. Schumacher / Ms. Brecht, and rejects immediate Protest in LG-Az 2b o244/11 and sends it by the Court of Appeal judgment.

 

On 14.3.2012 issue a decision, (as original Judge = Originäre Richterin) Judge Mrs. Brecht in the LG-Az 2b o 29/08 and rejects the request for granting PKH.

                                                      Note

This is the first demonstration as “single Judge” of Mrs. Brecht, that she learned the Method of avoid the substantial events, without explicitly infringement of the law, in order to satisfy the chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll   

 

The legal matter (litigation about a original Judge), has not yet been clarified by any senate and Greek Engineer insists that the decision of Mrs. Brecht is illegal and appealed to 22.3.2012.

 

In Case LG-Az 2b o265/11 another illegal staff Mr. Brüggemann / Mrs. Schumacher / Mrs. Brecht (with the participation of the relative of  legal castrated A…..cleaner Mr. Schumacher) adopt a decision on 15.3.2012 and rejects the request for grant PKH, as unjustified.

With short judgment of 15.3.2012 in OLG-Az 18 W 87/11 signed by Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann reject the Statement of defense (= Gegendarstellung) dated 18.02.2012 against the decision of the same Staff from 13.2.2012 (LG-Az 2b o 198 / 11) on the ground that the writings of Greek Engineer are not enough for a change of decision.

 

On 16.3.2012 shall act the staff Schwarz / Mrs. Seidler / Fröml in LG-Az 2b o238/11 and rejected the request to grant PKH, as unjustified. 

 

With extensive legal and practical explanations of Greek Engineer dated 17.03.2012 repulsed again the assertions of unfold young Mrs. Strauch, employee of the General Public Prosecutor´s office Dusseldorf, expressed in actions LG-Az 2b o238/11, LG-Az 2b o244/11, LG-Az 2b o265/11, which concerns requirements for compensation for mental anguish, because of the decisions of 23.3.2009 of illegally synthesized Staff, District-Court, Düsseldorf, Mrs. Tigges / Mrs. Schmidt / Mrs. Hoffmann in lawsuits LG-Az 2b o268/01, LG-Az 2b o118/99 and LG-Az 2b o143/08

 

With two negative decisions of 17.03.2012 of illegal staff Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht / Mr. Schwarz, one in Az 2b o 23/12 and another in LG-Az 2b o172/08 the staff reject arising protests and send them to the Court of Appeal for judgment.

 

New challenge with decision from 19.3.2012 signed by Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann of 18.Senate, Court of appeal  Düsseldorf delivers to the Greek Engineer in OLG-Az 18 W 4/12 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08), rejecting the Legal Reprimand from 21.2.2012 against the decision of 13.02.2012 and require for payment of costs based on the erroneous paragraph § 97 ZPO. There, appear no word about the unlawful Composition of the staff First Instance, criticized by the Greek Engineer. All committed right then.

 

The 18.Senate of Court of Appeal systematically apply the oath of mobsters "Omertá"

 

The new challenge repel the Greek Engineer on 30.3.2012.

 

On 21.3.2012 new refusal of illegal staff, Mr. Schwarz / Mrs. Schumacher / Mrs. Brecht (i.e. with participation of the associate's of legal castrated, A….cleaner, Mr. Schumacher) in LG-Az 2b o244/11) against direct protest action arising and sends it by the Court of Appeal for further judgment.

 

On 21.3.2012 new refusal of illegal staff, Mr. Schwarz / Fröml / Mrs. Brecht, in LG-Az 2b o2b o 22/12 and explain that rejected the request to grant PKH, because supposedly Greek Engineer had to pay expenses 1.496,54 € for a (court) admonishment, i.e. the mentioned staff have believed the words of the other party (taken from parallel lawsuit and presented by Mrs. Brecht!), without check the contents if it is true.

 

The Provocative justification (grounded on the false suspicion of Judge Mrs. Brecht), repel the Greek Engineer on 31.3.2012 with additional protest.

 

On 22.3.2012 shall act the Staff, Court of appeal,  Malsch / Haarmann / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 71/10 (concerning LG-Az 2b o118/99) and rejects the Reprimand of 25.1.2012, also refuses to approve the "Legal Protest" on the grounds that the conditions and requirements of paragraph § 574 ZPO are not fulfilled.

In other words, the staff writes:

Greek Engineer try to prove that indeed the conditions are met § 574 ZPO for Legal Protest

But the legal protest shall never approve.

 

The insidious effects of remote controlled and young Judges, Mrs. Hoffman and Mrs. Brecht, of 2b civil chamber, district Court of Düsseldorf in year 2012

 

The increased hatred of the Judges of First Instance, 2b Civil chamber, Düsseldorf, against the Greek Engineer by continuous direct protests / reprimands / rebuttals and the organized orchestration, is evident in decision which issued on 22.3.2012 by the illegally synthesized staff, Mrs.  Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht and rejects the request to grant PKH, for the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 271/01 submitted on 14.6.2011. The illegal staff naturally justify the rejection with the same argument of the Staff of precedent day, where participated Mrs. Brecht. i.e. the Greek Engineer has allegedly financial strength, and once he could pay 1.140, - € for the costs of the treatment LG-Az 2b o 29/08 etc.

Note

The false suspicion of Mrs. Brecht has been adopted without any control of the contents on the part of the quorum of 2b civil chamber

 

And here the intriguing Chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll does not mention one of the crimes of Tax Office, Mettmann, not a single decision of the Tax Court issued in favor of Greek Engineer, or even the demands of resigned Attorney Dr. Plötzgen, dated 13.8.2004. She finds advantageous to determine only the deviations, between the amounts of Greek Engineer, compared with the older amounts mentioned on 02.05.2001 by the resigned Attorney, (but not with the corrected dates on 13.8.2004). She avoids mentioning more than 1.000 receipts for the plundered 264.500, - DM; she avoid to mention the reimbursed amounts after 27 years and after more than 30 defeats of Inland Revenue in the Tax Court. The illegally synthesized Staff of district-Court Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht is silent hundreds evidence for losses caused by the crimes of tax office Düsseldorf, to Greek Engineer through seizures in banks and deductions by reimbursable taxes on basis of hypothetical tax evasion. Even the request for meager compensation for mental anguish, as proposed in his opinion the physician, rejected by remote controlled judges, and additionally gives the Guideline for blind i.e. guideline for Court of appeal Düsseldorf, which sends together the raised direct protest with Folder, and counseled for application of the mafia oath "OMERTA".

 

That refusal on 22.2.2012 in LG-Az 2b o 271/01, is few days later, on 26.3.2012, accompanied

from a call for the hearing, determined on the 20.6.2012.

 

The Greek Engineer can´t believe that on 20.06.2012 will be held the hearing

and individual agreeing opinion expresses the authorized Attorney. This is by trick.

 

With direct Protest dated 24.3.2012 against decision of 15.3.2012 on LG-Az 2b o 265/11 of illegal staff Brüggemann /Mrs. Schumacher /Mrs. Brecht, reacts the Greek Engineer against the false views of the new staff, that engage Mrs. Schumacher, the relative of legal castrated, A….cleaner, Mr.  Schumacher.

 

On 30.3.2012 the staff of 18. Senate Malsch/ Stobbe/ Haarmann Court of Appeal adopts a decision

in Case OLG-Az 18 W 21/12 (LG-Az 2b o 23/12, action directed against Judges Mrs. Stöve, Mrs. Fuhr, Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Mrs. Huth, Mrs. Schuster, also against the judges of Court of appeal Düsseldorf 18. Senate Malsch / Haarmann in protest OLG-Az I-18 W 16/04 and against the Judges of Court of appeal Düsseldorf 11.Senate Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Mr. Müller in protest OLG-Az I-11 W 17/05, concerning infringement of law of those in precedents lawsuits LG-Az 2b o 250/03 and LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and rejects the protest against the judgment at first instance on costs, with laconic ground that justification of the judgment at first instance is “correct and proper”.

 

Here the 18. Senate Court of Appeal with reference to paragraph § 127 ZPO avoids to mention the costs of Protest (This is done simply, by not give a reason to Greek Engineer for legal reprimand).

Let note that, accused Judges Mrs.  Stockschlaeder-Nöll, Malsch, Haarmann are excluded by law to participate in the decision of 30.03.2012; but the law is valid only for common mortals.

 

It results a new evidence for Greek Engineer to prove that

in all precedents protest not required Decision on costs, for PKH process.

 

On 30.3.2012 arises Protest against incorrect decision dated 19.03.2012 in Case OLG-Az 18 W  4/12 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08) for the costs of court of appeal, because they were determined based on the incorrect paragraph § 97 ZPO and additionally signed by two judges Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann accused by distortion of justice chicanery.

 

By protest from 31.3.2012 the Greek Engineer refutes the unfounded suspicions of Staff Schwarz / Fröml / Mrs. Brecht in the decision of 21.3.2012 in the treatment LG-Az 2b o 22/12, i.e. that Had paid the costs 1.496,54 € for strict warning in case LG-Az 2b o 29/08, which were based in order to reject the request to grant PKH.

 

On 2. Apr. 2012 raises the Greek Engineer direct Protest against the decision of 16.3.2012

of Mr. Schwarz / Mrs. Seidler /Mr. Fröml in treatment LG-Az 2b o 238/11 with which had refused

to approve the request to grant PKH

 

On 4. Apr. 2012 the ECHR  issued a decision signed by the uniquely Judge P. Lorenzen, that the protest with Number 10.714 / 12 of 6.2.2012 against the decision of the BGH, Az III ZB 79/11 (involves miscarriages in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 and distortion of justice on the part of Judges Mrs. Strupp-Müller / Mrs. Engelkamp -Neeser / Mr. Galle in LG-Az 2b o 177/10 not accepted.

 

He justified his rejection that protest does not meet the requirements of Articles 34 and 35 of the Declaration of human rights. Objection and Information excluded.

 

The decision is final. i.e. The chicanery of the Magistrates District Court and Court of Appeal are not enough in order to establish a conviction against other Colleagues Judges.

                     So functions the System of Solidarity among the Judges by the Courts.

                             Only simple citizen condemned, notably by A…….cleaner

 

On 5.4.2012 raises the Greek Engineer punctual direct protest against the first instance Decision from 22.3.2012 signed by Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht in treating

LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and accuses both Judges for illegal participation in the Council Decision.

Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll is excluded since 18.12.2002 based on Law, § 47 ZPO, in treatment 2b o 271/01 and exclusion application has not been decided yet.

 

10 years keep silent the abuser of competence of Justice. The same is valid for the very small A….cleaner, Mrs. Hoffman, since late March 2009.

 

On 10. April 2012 submitted by Greek Engineer additional statement by the PKH request in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

The General public prosecutor´s office Düsseldorf defends the accused Judges

 

Der Generalstaatsanwalt Düsseldorf  verteidigt die beschuldigten LG/OLG-Richter

 

Lo procuratore generale Düsseldorf difende come un avocato gli Giudici accusati

 

Le procureur général Düsseldorf défende les juges accusé

 

Η Γενική Εισαγγελία σαν Δικηγόρος Υπεράσπισης των παρανομούντων Δικαστών

 

On 11. Apr.2012 reappears the young unfold employee of General Public Prosecutor´s office, Mrs. Strauch, and gives a rebuttal, Az 2 FP 16/12, in treatment OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12, Court of appeal Düsseldorf (concerning compensation for the excessive duration of 12 years of treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and repeats twice that the refusal by the Court 4.4.2003 and 23.7.2004 of the Court of Appeal is allegedly correct and appropriate. No infringement did the judges, writes Mrs. Strauch.

 

Apparently Mrs. Strauch seeks for a removal in the Court of Appeal, where there is no effective control or by the activities or by execution times, and additional salaries are higher. So she does not want to embarrass anyone colleague Judge.

 

On 12.Apr. 2012 the Greek Engineer is obliged to exercise punctual (Legal) Blame (Anhörruge) against the decision of 30.03.2012, of Court of appeal Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 18 W 21/12 signed by Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann,  concerning the treatment (LG-Az 2b o 23/12), accused by chicanery and infringement of law.

 

On 12. Apr. 2012 adopts a Decision the illegally synthesized staff with the Judges Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Seidler (apprentice to 2b Civil chamber) in LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and rejecting the supplemental request to grant PKH.

 

Did you notice the reader, that every time participate in decisions of 2b Civil chamber an apprentice Judge? which as usual has no experience.

 

On 12. Apr. 2012 issued by illegally synthesized Court staff with Judges Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Seidler (apprentice to 2b Civil chamber) Decision in LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and rejects direct protest against the decision 5.4.2012, 22.3.2012 and sends it to the Court of Appeal Düsseldorf.

 

On 14. April 2012 sent Protest to Constitutional Court (BVerfG) in Karlsruhe, seeking to remove the decision from 19.03.2012 of illegally synthesized staff of Court of appeal in Dusseldorf OLG-Az I-18 W 4/12 signed from Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann, with which the above two judges rejected the request to grant PKH for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 170 / 08, where themselves are accused, and by law are excluded to participate in the decision adopted (see: BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 904/12); additionally that the decision adopted regarding the defined costs, on base of paragraph

 § 97 ZPO is deliberately false and contrary to civil code and constitution.

 

Asks the Constitutional Court to compete the deficits in PKH civil procedure, which concerning the appeal and Legal protest against decisions of Court of appeal.

 

On 16.04.2012 adopt a decision the Court of Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 18 W  9/12 (LG-2b o 143/08) signed by Malsch / Weith / Haarmann rejecting the (legal) reprimand from 13.02.2012 Appeal against the decision of 30.1.12 of the same judges. The legal protest to BGH not allowed.

 

On 16.04.2012 adopt a decision the Court of Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 18 W 23/12 (LG-Az 2b o 172/08) signed by Malsch / Weith / Haarmann rejecting direct protest from 24.10.2009 against the first instance judgment of 14.10.2009 on the grounds that the Court decision is “correct and proper”.

 

By treatment LG-Az 2b o 172/08 ask the Greek Engineer that, the Tax Office reveals all entries in

the secret number of accounts kept and recorded the plundered amounts or payments of Greek Engineer and his spouse, but his request had rejected by a illegally synthesized staff Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Hoffmann

 

Got reader?

 

• > When the Inland Revenue catch a citizen somewhere to keep a secret accounts then it have the right to demand execution of seizure and initiate criminal prosecution for tax evasion.

 

• > The accused Citizen, knock down, like an octopus, and is difficult to escape the imprisonment.

 

• > But when the Tax Office do the same i.e. Keep secret account and registers plundered etc. are the Judges of Court that the tax office exempt from the obligation to fully show what records and entries made in the Secret Account.

 

• > The Treasury of the tax office is for ordinary mortals, "sanctuary", as the ancient Greek temples.

 

• > Then, the appellate judges First Instance cover the crimes and the treatment costs imposed on a citizen.

 

• > In every bite he eats the ordinary citizen, the state removes a piece (taxes which imposes directly and indirectly to food) to pay the high earners of the state apparatus.

 

• > The defeathering of Citizen in Germany, have uploaded to rights guaranteed of high paid tax officer and of the Judges.

On 16.04.2012 adopt a decision the Court of Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 18 W  25/12 (LG-Az 2b o 244/11) signed by Malsch / Weith / Haarmann rejecting the direct protest from 18.02.2012 against first instance judgment of 8.2.2012 on the grounds that, the decision Court is supposedly “right and proper”.

 

Recall that, in mentioned treatment (LG-Az 2b o 244/11) are accused: the Judges Mrs. Tannert / Mrs. Wolks-Falter / Mrs. Stöve / Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Strupp-Müller / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Tigges of district court Düsseldorf, by chicanery, by infringement of Law in LG-Az 2b o 118/99 etc, also the Judges  Mrs. Obst-Oellers / Stobbe / Bender  of court of appeal for perversion of justice in OLG-Az 11 W 57/01, OLG-Az 11 W 58/02, OLG-Az 11 W 12/03 and the judges Dr. Bünten / Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes / Mrs. Baan in OLG-Az 11 W 54/09, as well as Mr. Malsch / Haarmann / Mrs. Schröder in OLG-Az 18 W 42/03 by chicanery etc.

 

The entire cream of judicial lawlessness and corrupt judges, pretend to be innocent doves.

 

The machinations of Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll and tricks in the LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

The conspiracy of Mrs. Stocksclaeder-Nöll and her tricks at the process 2b o 271/01

 

Die Intrigen der Fr. Stockschaeder-Nöll und ihre Kniffe im Prozess LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

Gli intrighi della Signora Stockschaeder-Nöll ed i suoi trucchi nel processo LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

Les intrigues di Madame Stockschlaeder-Nöll et ses ruses dans le procès  LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

Οι Ραδιουργίες της Κα. Στοκσλεντερ-Νοελ και τα τερτίπια της στην 2β ο 271/01

 

By the decision of 20. Apr. 2012 of Staff (Mrs. Rotzheim / Koewius / Weishaupt), 11. Senate, Court of appeal, Düsseldorf, signed by the newness Vice-president of Court of appeal, Mrs. Rotzheim in OLG-Az 11 W 5/11 (LG-Az 2b o 6/11) rejected as inadmissible, the rebuttal of Greek Engineer from 2.3.2012, with reference to paragraph 321a, Section 4, series 4, ZPO.

 

All the illegalities and crimes of Court of appeal 11. Senate

Committed on the treatment LG-Az 2b o 6/11 suppressed without exception.

The protest costs imposed on Greek Engineer.

 

    Got Reader?

 

Thus functions the parasitic, some judicial, sector in Germany, i.e. With people subservient, willing to sign all that inflicted from above, in order to secure their positions.

(See, also www.ivan-zilic.de)

 

By Protest 20. April 2012 to the Federal Constitutional Court, the Greek Engineer Requests the abolishment of the Decision of 22.3.2012, 18. Senate, Court of appeal, OLG-Az 18 W 71/10 Düsseldorf, on the ground that, the composition of Staff Malsch / Haarmann / Weith was illegal

and that the Judges Malsch / Haarmann were excluded to participate in the Council Decision.

 

In his reply of 24.4.2012 to the treatment, which runs in the Court of Appeal, OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12, the Greek Engineer refutes the false claims from 11.4.2012 of employee of general public  Prosecutor´s office, Dusseldorf, Mrs.  Strauch.

 

On 27.4.2012 to fulfill the statutory short periods of 14 calendar days the Greek Engineer raises two legal reprimands and especially,

 

one against the Decision of 16.04.2012 of illegally synthesized staff of 18. Senate (see paragraph § 579 I, 1, ZPO) in current protest OLG-Az I-18 W 23/12 (LG-Az 2b o 172/08) and requesting the abolishment of the decision, because it is signed by two judges (Malsch / Haarmann) accused in LG-Az 2b o 154/08,  LG-Az 2b o 6/11 and accused with penal lawsuit in OLG- III - 1 Ws 80/11, as responsible for damage to Greek Engineer, and asks to approve the “Legal Protest” and so access the conditions of (BGH) high Civil Court.

 

The other legal reprimand from 27.04.2012 directed against the decision of 16.4.2012 of illegally synthesized staff of 18. Senate (see Article 579 I, 1, ZPO) in the current protest OLG-Az I-18 W 25 / 12 (LG-Az 2b o 244/11) and requesting the abolishment of the decision, because it is signed by two judges (Malsch / Haarmann) accused in the LG-Az 2b o 144/11, as responsible for damage to Greek Engineer, and asks to approve the Legal Protest, and so access the conditions of (BGH) Supreme Civil Court.

 

On 27.4.2012 issued a decision the Staff (Mrs. Rotzheim / Weishaupt / Koewius) of 11. Senate Court of appeal, Düsseldorf, signed by the newness Vice-President of court of Appeal Mrs. Rotzheim in OLG-Az 11 W 82/10 (LG-2b o 143/08) and rejects the Legal reprimand of Greek Engineer against the former decision, as unacceptable. The staff insists that in the previous decision dated 21.12.2011 the defined Protest costs on basis of paragraph § 97 ZPO are right (!) and denies correct them.

 

All the illegalities and crimes of Court of appeal 11.Senate committed on treatment LG-Az 2b o 143/11 hushed without exception. Protest costs imposed again in Greek Engineer.

 

With Direct protests 29.04.2012 Greek Engineer is turning against the decision of district Court,

2b civil chamber from 04.12.12 issued by an illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Seidler (Apprentice Judge) in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 271/01 and blames the staff for false allegations and vague, unjustified suspicions against Greek Engineer. All the illegal decisions and acts of judicial staffs are systematically suppressed.

 

Furthermore, Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll is by law (§ 47 ZPO) since 18.12.2002 excluded, because of bias, and in treatment LG-Az 2b o 154/08 is also accused by chicanery and punishable acts.

 

On 16.12.2008 it had also submitted a request for exclusion because of infringements of European laws Article 1 EuGVVO, and German law Article 7 EGBGB, and German Constitution Article 103 GG i.e. Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll made illegal secret efforts on 24. July / 8. August / 30. Sept. 2008, and tried to put out of the running the Greek Engineer as incapable to sue (with the help of the guardianship court of city Essen) and the application for exclusion requests have not heard yet.

 

On 2. May 2012 adopts a decision, usually illegally synthesized Staff of 2b civil chamber, Mrs.  Stockschlaeder-Noll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht and pretends falsely that, the composition of the staff was lawful and that all requests for exclusion are already “heard and rejected”. For the apprentice Judge Seidler claims that came as substitute wherefore lacked Mrs.  Brecht.

 

Here is allowed a comparison with Göbbels-propaganda, which supported hereinafter.

 

"The bigger the lie, is more easily to be believed."

 

On 4. May 2012 adopts a decision the Federal Constitutional Court in Protest with Az 2 BvR 903/12 and judges Mrs.  Lübbe-Wolff / Hubel / Mrs. Kessal-Wulf and decide " the Constitutional Complaint against the decisions 22.3.2012 and 25.1.2012, Court of Appeal Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az I- 18 W 71/10 (LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and the request for security measure against the right to obtain execution, not accepted in the process for decision on the merits; "Explanations does not give the staff and the constitutional Protest sent to archive”.

 

On 4.5.2012 issued the single Judge Mrs. Brecht, 2b Civil chamber, district court, Düsseldorf, a decision in treatment LG-Az 2b o 29/08 and rejects the Direct Protest from 23.03.2012 against the decision of same Judge dated 14.3.2012, with which rejected the request for granting PKH on the ground, that the plaintiff (= Greek Engineer) has allegedly financial strength and can pay the costs after he paid the court costs for the Lawsuit LG-Az 2b o 29/08; she inflates the amount again from 1.140 - € to  1.496, - €. She explains that she has the right, accordingly paragraph § 348 ZPO, to decide as single Judge without the quorum of 2b Civil chamber etc.

 

On 7. May 2012 the Greek Engineer submits a protest to the Federal Constitutional Court-Justice against decisions of 04.16.12 and 30.1.2012, of 18.Senate, Court of appeal, in OLG-Az I-18 W 9/12, Düsseldorf, because of unlawful treatment of judges of First Instance in (LG-Az 2b o 143/08) Mrs. Brückner-Hoffmann / Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Schims, apprentices); The OLG-Staff Malsch / Weith / Haarmann had rejected as non-essential the Legal reprimand dated 13.02.12 and not allowed the Legal Protest, decision signed by Malsch / Weith / Haarmann i.e. By two judges Malsch / Haarmann, charged by accusations of perversion of justice, for chicanery etc.

 

Also requesting the abolishment of the decision of court of appeal and approval of the requested PKH, and argues that the legal reprimand meets the conditions of paragraph § 253 ZPO.

On 7. Mai 2012 the district-Court, Düsseldorf, with illegal Staff Fröml / Brüggemann / Mrs. Brecht issued a decision in treatment LG-Az 2b o 265/11 and rejects the immediate protest of 24.3.2012 as not enough justified the proof of causality for invoked damage, and indicates the text before the paragraph § 253, Remark 23, ZPO.

 

On 12. May 2012 submitted by Greek Engineer new Protest to the Federal Constitutional Court against the decisions of 15.03.2012 and 13.2.2012, 18. Senate, Court of appeal, in OLG-Az I-18 W 87/11 Düsseldorf, signed by Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann, (LG-Az 2b o 198/11, treatment cut off from the great treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01 which refers to crimes of tax office and of plundered amounts), witch which the mentioned OLG-Staff rejected as non-essential the Legal reprimand from 9.1.2012 and not allowed the Legal Protest against decision signed by 2 judges Malsch/ Haarmann, who are accused of distortion of Justice, of chicanery etc. Also requesting the abolishment of the decision of court of Appeal, and approval of the request to grant PKH, and argues that the composition of the district-Court, 2b civil chamber on 12.10.2011 of Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht) was illegal.

 

The transfer of Mrs. Baan, Member of the Putsch-Club of 11.Senate, to the 18.Senate of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf; Consequences, 34 perversion of Justice

 

Die Versetzung der Fr. Baan, Mitglied des Putschisten-Vereins, vom 11^en  zum 18^en OLG-Senat

 

Lο trasferimento della Signora Baan, membro del Club di Putschisti, dall 11. al 18. Senato della Corte d´appello di Düsseldorf

 

ΗΜετάθεσητηςΜπααναπό 11. Σύγκλητο στη 18^η Σύγκλητο Εφετείου, Συνέπειες από διαστροφή Δικαιοσύνης

 

 

On 16.5.2012 Mrs. Baan changed in 18. Senate Court of appeal in staff Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan, and as Reporter apply new tactic; i.e. Avoiding explanations for discharges speaks, claiming only that the decision at first instance is correct and appropriate, i.e. without going to the legal issues

of violations, which focuses all direct protest. All wrongdoing, chicanery, perversions of justice, violations of law made from court of appeal, crimes from tax authorities, invoked by the Greek Engineer and raised to the lawsuit with documentary evidence and exact copies, hushed systematically by Ms. Baan, bury them, Mr. Malsch is satisfied, and the other two judges undersign everything.

 

On 16.5.2012 issued a decision 18. Senate court of Appeal in OLG-Az 18 W 33/12 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) undersigned Mr. Malsch /Mr. Weith / Mrs. Baan with rejection of direct protest dated 5.4.2012 against the first instance decision of 22.3.2012, with a few words like grounds, i.e. The first instance sentence is “correct and proper” and Direct Complaining does not help to change the challenged decision of the District- Court.

 

Reader beware signature of reporter:

Ms. Baan, will occupy us intensively in the future.

 

On 16.5.2012 issued a decision 18. Senate court of Appeal in Appeal in  OLG-Az 18 W 38/12 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) signed Malsch / Weith / Mrs. Baan with rejection immediate protest dated 29.04.2012 against first instance decision of 12.4.2012, with a few words like grounds, i.e. the first instance sentence is right and proper.  Direct Complaining does not help to change the challenged decision of District Court.

 

The indignation pushes Greek Engineer to send on 17. May 2012 a new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, directed against the decisions of 17.2.2012 and 20.4.2012 of 11. Senate, Court of appeal, Düsseldorf, signed by Ms. Rotzheim / Koewius / Weishaupt; the mentioned staff ignored the arguments invoked in legal reprimand dated 01.02.2012 against OLG-Az I-11 W 5/11, regarding the exclusion request of Judges of District-Court, Düsseldorf, in Az 2b o 6/11, including among others Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll, due to bias; is also affected that the 11. Senate rejected as inadmissible the last legal rebuttal.

 

On 21. Mai 2012 sends Mrs. Strauch of the General Public Prosecutor´s office, Dusseldorf, one objection to Court of appeal  in there current Lawsuit OLG-Az 18 SchH 3/12 and attempts to refute with only 15 rows the multipage arguments of Greek Engineer.

 

Of course, the chair of the young Mrs. Strauch is for swing and not wasting energy for objections.

 

On 22 May 2012 issued a decision the illegally synthesized 18. Senate Court of appeal  (Malsch / Haarmann / Mrs. Baan) and with 5 poor rows rejects Legal reprimand from 27.04.2012 against the decision of 16.4.2012 of the same Senate, as unjustified and not approve the Legal Protest to the high Civil Court. (BGH)

 

With its judgment of 23. Mai 2012, of 24. Senate, Court of Appeal, in OLG-Az 24 W 26/12, signed by Rodermund / Mrs. Hartung / Fricke, explains the prevailing anomaly in Düsseldorf district-Court, but endorses the views of the alleged financial strength of Greek Engineer, (suspicion of the judge Mrs. Brecht, of 2b civil chamber, district court) and confirm the transactions (rejection of request to grant PKH) emitted by unique Judge Mrs. Brecht, in the treatment of (LG-Az 2b o 29/08), while rejecting raised direct Protest. (I.e. the 24. Senate Applies the guideline, contained in NAB of the District-Court, without deviations).

 

Reader please, wait:

The anomaly by the 24.Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, will appear and shall be understand in year 2016

 

On 25. Mai. 2012 sends the Greek Engineer protest to the European Court because the Court of First Instance (LG-Az 2b o 118/99) i.e. the 2b civil chamber district-Court and the court of Appeal  Düsseldorf  (18. Senate, OLG-Az 18 W 71/10), rejected the request to grant PKH for the treatment of the LG-Az 2b o 118/99, with reference on the false paragraph of BGB.

 

On 25. Mai 2012 reappears the known and incorrigible Judge, Mr. Schwarz (whoever 2002 had abused the regulated title of “Judge of district Court”) and with the illegal synthesized staff Mr. Schwarz / Mrs. Schumacher / Mrs. Seidler rejects direct protest against the decision of 04.16.12 in treatment of LG-Az 2b o 238/11.

 

Recall that the young Miss Schumacher has a first degree kinship with the "Legal castrated Judge Mr. Schumacher" and former puppet of Ms. Tannert, and therefore had (illegal) interest to participate in the Council Decision 25.05.2012 for support of the Relative.

 

Reader, see how decisions councils are composed?

and on what grounds the judges are chosen by the council decision ?.

 

The short legal deadlines of 14 calendar days, causes Greek Engineer to rise on 26. Mai 2012 “(Legal) Reprimand”, against the decision of 18.Senate, Court of appeal, to OLG-Az 18 W 33/12

(LG-Az 2b o 271/01); he denounced the illegal participation of Ms. Baan to the Council (Mrs. Baan, charged for further 60 chicanery / miscarriages / Laws violations and punishable, committed during her job by 11. Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf), and he request the annulment of the contested Decision of illegally synthesized Staff.

 

On 27. Mai 2012 the Greek Engineer rise (Legal) Reprimand against the decision of 18.Senate, Court of appeal, to OLG-Az 18 W 38/12 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) and complaints the illegal participation of Mrs. Baan in Council (Mrs. Baan, accused additionally for 60 chicanery / miscarriages / Laws violations and punishable acts) and apply for invalidation of the contested Decision of illegally synthesized Staff.

On 29. May 2012 issued by the (BVerfG) Federal Constitutional Court, with Judge Gerhardt / Mrs. Hermanns / Müller, 5 decisions and decides at all, does not introduce any protest at a decision on the substance, and sends all 5 complaints filed. These concern:

 

•  the protest with the BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 904/12, against two decisions: of 19. March 2012 and of 13.02.2012, of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 18 W 4/12 (concerning LG-Az 2b o 170/08 i.e. the legal castrated Judge Mr. Schumacher, and  his illegalities)

• > the protest with the BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 98/12 against two Decisions: of 24.11.2011 and of 25.07.11, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (concerns LG-Az 2b o 177/10 i.e. illegalities of Judge Strupp-Müller / Engelkamp-Neeser / Galle in the LG-Az 2b o 271/01)

•  > the protest with the BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 699/11 against three Decisions: of 5.12.10, of 31.3.10 and of 30.3.10 court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 11 W 41/09 (concerns LG-Az 2b o 143/08 i.e. illegalities of First Instance Judge Stockschlaeder-Nöll and Brückner-Hoffmann in the LG-Az 2b o 118/99)

•  > the protest with the BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 698/11 against three Decisions: of 05.12.2010, of 03.31. 10 and of 30.03.2010 court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 11 W 40/09 (concerns LG-Az 2b o 194/07 i.e. illegalities of First Instance Judge Stockschlaeder-Nöll in LG-Az 2b o 271/01)

•  the protest with the BVerfG-Az 2 BvR 678/11 against all decisions of 12.5.10, 31.3.10 and 30.3.10 court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, 11. Senate on:

 

OLG-Az 11 W 39/09 (LG-Az 2b o 129/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 42/09 (LG-Az 2b o 172/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 43/09 (LG-Az 2b o 142/08),

OLG-Az 11 W 44 / 09 (LG-Az 2b o 145/08)

 

all the above decisions relating to the criminal acts of raved putschist  of 11. Senate, Court of appeal,  Dusseldorf, named:

 

Mr. Bünten, Mrs. Baan, Mrs. Jungclaus, Mr. Wermeckes, Mr. Müller, Mr. Dahm,  

Mrs. Grabensee,

 

For the judges of the Constitutional Court, the world is wonderfully angelic made and not have to deal with inconvenient protest. Their high salary runs and every two years growing.

                                                          - 2011-   (17.11.2011 bis 4.1.2012)

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

The last decisions of Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members (Mrs. Baan/Mr. Wermeckes) of the 11.Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf

 

The new composition (Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Koewius /Mr. Weishaupt) of the 11.Senate, but with the same mentality   

 

The crushing cliffs of new paragraph § 198 GVG, the sentences of BGH and ECHR

and the resulting legal implications

 

Advocate Mr. Tegebauer and the refusal of ECHR 

 

 

 

On 17. Nov. 2011 Advocate Lasaroff notifies to the Court of Appeal that intends to bring an appeal against the second judgment by default dated 12.10.2011 LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and requested the provision PKH for appeal.

 

So begins by the Greek Engineer a new adventure by 18. Senate Court of appeal Düsseldorf no. Protocol  18 U 223/11.

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

     WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC 

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

 

 

On 23.11.2011 the illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffmann adopt a decision in LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and rejects the immediate protest from 14.11.2011 with the following justification:

 

The Plaintiff has not shown that in the Dossier was contained the request from 12.11.2002 for exclusion of chairwoman. But for the exclusion request from 18.12.2002 writes not a word!   OMERTÁ

 

Moreover:

 

Doctor Med. failed in his Opinion, dated 11.3.2011, to detect supposedly psychical wounds by Greek Engineer, impudently pretends the illegal staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffmann of 2b civil chamber!

 

On 24. Nov. 2011 adopts a decision the 18.Senate Court of appeal, Malsch / Stobbe / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (LG-Az 2b o 177/10) and rejects the reprimand from 6.8.2011 against the decision of 25.7.2011 of the same staff as unjustified and pretends that the decision does not offend the rights of the plaintiff, and additionally not approve Legal protest, to the Greek Engineer.

 

Here the 18. Senate Court of appeal mixes two different reprimands but does not accept another observation by correction.

 

On 28.11.2011 the arrogance of praetorian Putsch-Club evidenced by issued decision of Staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Baan / Wermeckes in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01, concerning the decision of 18.9.2007 of illegally synthesized Staff of District- Court, Mr. Galle/Mrs. Strupp-Müller/Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser) and rejects reprimand dated 19.06.2011 as unjustified, and claims not to offend the rights of plaintiff, Greek Engineer. Reiterates, that in this case was the lawyer supposedly mandatory because PKH procedure had supposedly ended and had supposedly started hearing treatment process. It pretends it does not understand why had to be excluded from the decision 7.6.2011 the appellate Mr. Wermeckes and Mrs. Jungclaus

 

Of course do not forget to apply for payment of costs on Greek Engineer, notably calculated on base of incorrect § 97 of the ZPO. Finally do not approve the Legal Protest and justify that the conditions listed in § 574, Section 2 ZPO are not satisfied.

 

As perceived by the reader, basically confirm that the PKH procedure not require to authorize a lawyer but the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mrs. Baan /Mr. Wermeckes convert the theme of representation in PKH procedure, into a legal dilemma i.e. If the PKH process finished and when finished, so in the treatment must be a authorized lawyer. They cause with this trick the Greek Engineer bring legal proofs that PKH procedure did not end, and if delivered the proofs, than can argue that are not satisfactory.

 

With this trick the Praetorian Putsch-Club is trying to impose the payment of costs based on the incorrect § 97 of the ZPO, for being expenses spicily. At the same time they do not approve the Legal Protest; and so avoid informing the judges of high courts about the machinations of court of Appeal Düsseldorf.

 

On 6.12.2011 unleashes the Greek Engineer new lawsuit (LG-Az 2b o 238/11) by chicanery and perversion of justice by the judges of District-Court and of Court of Appeal in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and applying for approval PKH.

By 7.12.2011 refute the views of illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht, forth in complementary decision from 12.10.2011 in the LG-Az 2b o 268/01, explains Greek Engineer the breaches of the Judge excluded by law, and asks to be sent the letter to the Court of Appeal.

 

On 12.12.2011 unleashes the Greek Engineer new Lawsuit (LG-Az 2b o 244/11) by chicanery and perversion of justice on the part of Judges of district Court and Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and applying for approval PKH.

 

On 15. December 2011 the headquarters Schlick / Dörr / Wöstmann / Seiters / Tombrink with Mr. Schlick, Vice-president of BGH, adopt a decision in Az III ZA 35/11 concerning the request for PKH for NZB against the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 22.2.2011 Dusseldorf Number Protocol OLG-Az 18 W 76/10 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) with the following content:

 

"The application for approval PKH to the purpose to submit LegalProtest rejected, because the intended legal effect does not have sufficient prospects of success. The Court of Appeal decision is final (§ 321a, Nr. 4, leap 4 ZPO) "

 

On 19.12.2011 the Chairwoman Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll asks the Greek Engineer in LG-Az 2b o 238/11 if he agrees with her proposal to send the last two lawsuits from 6.12.2011 and 12.12.2011 (LG-Az 2b o 238/11, LG-Az 2b o 244/11 2b) to the tribunal of Essen, but the Greek Engineer rejects the proposal.

 

Obviously the Chairwoman feels that decide over such issues which her concern, in particular so often, will not end well.

 

On 19.12.2011 requesting the Greek Engineer PKH by one NZB to BGH directed against the Decision of 28.11.2011 of praetorian Putsch-Club Rotzheim / Baan / Wermeckes court of Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01)

 

Last glimpses of arrogance of the “phantom of the opera”, 11. Senate and Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member name Wermeckes on 20.12.2011 found in a judgment of Staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Wermeckes / Koewius in OLG-Az 11 W 81/10 (LG-Az 2b o 170/08).

 

The named Staff rejects request for exclusion of praetorian Putsch-Club-Members  Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes / Mrs. Baan / Müller as unacceptable and abusive. The one signatory of the staff is Putsch-Club-Member,  Mr. Wermeckes, whoever accused by chicanery, infringements  of Articles Constitution, (felony under paragraph § 339 StGB Criminal Code), decides himself for rejection exclusion of, and the other two signatories of Solidarity. The European Law is, on the part of the Putsch-Club, ignored.

 

Moreover, the immediate protest against decision of 9.9.2010 of illegally synthesized Staff Court (Mrs. Keiser / Mrs. Baumeister / H. Schwarz, which rejected the dismissal request of Chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll) reject as unjustified. No violation committed the aforementioned staff, claiming the Praetorian Putsch-Club.

 

Last efforts of the “phantom of the opera”, 11.Senate and Praetorian Putsch-Club. name Wermeckes, on 21.12.2011 to obtain support from his colleagues, found in a judgment of Staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Wermeckes / Koewius in OLG-Az 11 W 82/11 (LG Az 2b o 143/08)

 

The illegal Staff rejects exclusion request for Putsch-Club-Members  Wermeckes / Mrs. Baan / Müller as unacceptable and abusive.

 

 

The Putsch-Club-Member Wermeckes, whoever accused by chicanery, breaches Articles Constitution etc. (In degree of Crime, pursuant to paragraph § 339 StGB Criminal Code), decides himself for rejection exclusion of, and the other two signatories of Compassion, because already has been notified his removal.

 

Moreover, the immediate protest against decision dated 9.9.2010 of illegally synthesized Staff Court (Mrs. Keiser / Mrs. Baumeister / H. Schwarz, in which it rejected the request dismissal of Judge Mrs. Hoffman) is rejected as unjustified. No violation committed the aforementioned staff of district court, claiming the Praetorian Putsch-Club.

 

Naturally not forget to apply for payment of costs in Greek Engineer, notably the determination made by the incorrect section § 97 ZPO.

 

With new composition, i.e. Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Koewius /Mr. Weishaupt, but with the same mentality within the heads, displayed on 21.12.2011 the mentioned staff of 11. Senate Court of appeal Düsseldorf a decision 11 W 5/11 (LG-AZ 2b o 6 / 11 concerns the miscarriages of justice, legal offenses, offenses of Judges 11. Senate Court of appeal etc. Estimated accordance with paragraph § 339 StGB Criminal Code) rejects immediate protest dated 27.02.2011 against first instance decision 7.2.2011 of illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Dr. Schumacher / Mrs. Keiser (who had rejected the exclusion request of Chairwoman as abusive) and decide that the decision of illegally synthesized staff with participation of excluded Chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll, is correct and applicable.    

 

The Costs imposed again in Greek Engineer and defined again based on wrong Paragraph § 97 ZPO.

 

On 26.12.2011 an application to approval PKH by one NZB to BGH, directed against the decision of 24.11.2011, 18. Senate Malsch / Stobbe / Weith, Court of Appeal of Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (LG-Az 2b o 177/08 concerns the deliberate wrong decision dated 8.9.2007 of Mrs. Strupp-Müller /Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Galle) and classes focus on attack on Constitutional Rights of Articles 3, 101, 103 GG, EKMR Art. 6, and unlawful composition of Staff Strupp-Müller / Engelkamp-Neeser / Galle

 

On 27.12.2011 submitted to the Constitutional Court (BVerfG) Protest against decision of 24.11.2011 Malsch / Stobbe / Weith Appeal in Düsseldorf OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (LG-Az 2b o 177/08 Mrs. Strupp-Müller /Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser /Mr. Galle) and focus the categories on infringement of Constitutional Rights of Articles 3, 101, 103 GG, and Art. 6 EKMR.

 

 

The new paragraph § 198 GVG and legal implications

 

Der neue Paragraph § 198 GVG und die rechtlichen Folgen

 

Il nuovo paragrafo § 198 GVG e le conseguenze giuridiche

 

 

In (ECHR) European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg/France, have gathered about 15 Protests against (GFR) Germany for breach of Article 6 (EKMR) European Declaration of Human Rights due to excessive length of Lawsuits for compensation, for damage, caused by state organs or services Germany. Among them are the two Protests of Greek Engineer since 2010.

 

 

The German Government in Berlin feels the risk of conviction (since updated regularly from there attached German judge) and attempts the latter was currently amending the legal framework for damages claims.

 

To establish the law introduces the new paragraph § 198 in GVG (Law about the constitution  and Operation of the courts) and putting it into force on 3.12.2011; The new paragraph requires that before submitted a complaint to the ECHR for compensation due to excessive length of proceedings, the Citizen must raise reprimand and no later than six months after the enforceable decision last stage Courts to submit a claim for damages for the excessive length of proceedings initially direct to the Court of Appeal of the capital of Land, where he lives, (on the grounds that this shortened the trial time), otherwise the protest by the ECHR is inadmissible, because it has not exhausted all levels of Justice of Germany.

 

And the courts of appeal together BGH converted in this way into cliff crushing applications for compensation, as described below

 

One wretched citizen, filed in the Court of Appeal Hanover lawfulness treated for compensation for excessive length of proceedings and has applied for approval PKH, but the Court of appeal Hanover refused it.

 

Immediately, brought immediate protest against the decision of the Court of Appeal, Hanover, which the court of appeal rejected, but sent by crisis to BGH. And the BGH ruled that the Court of Appeal decision to reject the immediate protest is correct and proper.

 

 

Decisions of Courts of Appeal in PKH procedure for compensation for the excessive duration of proceedings is not affected by direct protest (even in cases when the court of appeal decides as first stage) but requires “Legal Protest”, “which will have to adopt the Court of Appeal”.

 

In other words, the wretched of the case, missed eggs and baskets, because his lawyer interpreted the paragraph by direct protest otherwise than that the BGH.

 

The ECHR informs by letter of 14.12.2011 the authorized lawyer of Greek Engineer, Mr. Tegebauer, that in Germany since 3.12.2011 prevalent due process for new treatments for compensation owing to the excessive length of proceedings and asks if they will exhaust the novel Procedure and whether to withdraw the protest (Number: 33.988 / 10 and Number: 74.300 / 10) of the ECHR.

 

On 4.1.2012 answers the ECHR, the Solicitor Mr. Tegebauer, that the protest was long ago introduced and applied the new paragraph § 198 GVG. With reference to another judgment of the ECHR seeks to justify the admissibility of the complaint.

 

On 12.7.2012 the ECHR rejects the two complaining of Attorney, Mr. Tegebauer, as unacceptable, because not exhausted the applicable due process in Germany. Germany temporarily relieved of the weight of the categories of Greek Engineer and the ECHR relieved from the weight of the work.

 

Here is a reference to the case of Polish Engineer, Mr. Zilic, whoever ran away to the ECHR and found that there apply "Oiling". Behold www.Ivan-Zilic.de.

 

 

- 2011 - (από 7.6.11 εως 12.10.2011)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

 

Oath of Mobster “Omertá”, and the decisions of Putsch-club (Mrs. Jungclaus/
/Mrs. Baan/Mr. Wermeckes)

 

Indifference or paid Tolerance, of BGH / BVerfG / ECHR (in Strasbourg / France)

 

The trap of Stockschlaeder-Nöll dated 19. Sept. 2011 in LG-Az 2b o 268/01

 

The false allegations of Stockschlaeder-Nöll to keep off the advocate Mr. Klöpper

 

The Hearing on 5.Oct. 2011 in treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01 with the illegal staff (Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs. Brecht/Mrs. Hoffman)

 

The request according § 121 ZPO and the perplexity of Judges 2b civil chamber

 

The elimination of the medical opinion from judicial folder, to enable the judges, to reject claims for compensation for mental anguish, because of the crimes of tax office

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC

PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

On 7. June 2011 adopts by the Praetorian Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes new provocative decision in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) i.e. Involving the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mrs. Jungclaus and the Phantom of the Opera 11. Senate named Wermeckes and decide that immediate protest from 6.1.2011, is abusive and discarded.

The Protest have allegedly to be signed by a Attorney, argued the Putsch-Club; the expenses for Protest imposed on Greek Engineer and determined again based on the wrong paragraph of the ZPO. 

 

Note: the argument is false, because concerns PKH-Procedure, and any citizen can sign application

 

On 9. June 2011 adopted by the BVerfG notification to Az 2 BvR 763/11 signed by Di Fabio / Gerhardt / Herrmanns that the protest against the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal decision of 22.2.2011 and 7.12.2010 in OLG-Az I-18 W 76/10 (LG-Az 2b the 271/01), not put in examination proceedings on the merits (and ends on file). So become Final again illegalities of Judge of First Instance and of Court of Appeal.

 

The rule of law becomes in this way a Member entrenched lawlessness, corruption and chicanery Justice.

 

On 14.6.2011 submitted to the District-Court a fresh application (68 pages) for approval PKH for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01, for the following partial demands:

 

I. To be condemned the defendant NRW to pay compensation 1.779.197, - € plus Interest, from the date of registration of the application to the Court, by 5% over the basic interest rate (based on the Request, loss of subsidy of the Ministry of National Economy for investment in Greece, because of forfeiture on behalf of the tax authorities)

 

II. To be condemned the defendant NRW to pay the monthly Pension 3.323, - € / month plus Interest, from the date of registration of the application to the Court, with 5% above the base rate (Request based on the loss of cash by which to pay the subscriptions Pension Fund because of seizures on behalf of the tax authorities)

 

III. To be condemned the defendant NRW to pay compensation 50.ooo, - € for mental Suffering, plus interest from the date of registration of the application in the First Instance, by 5% above the base rate. (Request relying on foreclosures and reimbursable withholding taxes on behalf of tax-office Mettmann / Düsseldorf, in the years 1979/1999),
destruction of the family and of investment in Greece.

On 15.6.2011 submitted to the District Court a fresh application for approval PKH for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01 for restoration the damage, focusing the dead investment of 748.531,43 €, at the factory in Greece for realization of Patents, as well as for the reparation costs from third parties, and also requested indemnity 50.000, - € for mental anguish.

 

On 15.6.2011 performs calculation of Greek Engineer Editorial height with the legal right standing in court and qualified curator, Mrs. Ketteler-Jansen, under the preposition, as if the tax office did not had seizures and sends the results by mail. 

 

The Folder served on Greek Engineer open and torn.

 

Obviously Moles (of Intelligence/secret service) Monitoring and listening phone call, informed the Post-Services, tore the envelope, copied calculations and attachments and sent ostentatiously the envelope open to Greek Engineer.

 

You reader what you mind? that only in East Germany was done systematically monitored Citizens?

 

By (legal) reprimand (Anhörrüge, under § 321a ZPO) dated on 06.19.2011 against the decision of the Praetorian Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim /Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes from 7.6.2011 to OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) focusing again the illegal composition of Staff of Mrs. Rotzheim, and put the request for approval of the “Legal Protest” to the BGH, because challenging the excluded judges of Praetorian Putsch-Club due bias and chicanery, Mrs. Jungclaus and Mr. Wermeckes, participate in decision.

 

On 22.6.2011 persuaded (by whom?) after just two years delay, the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mrs. Jungclaus and Mr. Wermeckes to give official statement in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) and expressed in embarrassing accusations of Greek Engineer.

 

They claim that complied the currently applicable laws etc. i.e. They are innocent doves!

 

Unsigned official statements of Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members, the Greek Engineer shall return within the same day, and causes them to sign the statements by hand and to repost on 7.7.2011.

 

On 27. June 2011 issued by the Constitutional Court (BVerfG) four (4) decisions signed Mellinghoff / Lübbe-Wolf / Huber concerning 3 of them decisions of Praetorian Putsch-Club of 11. Senate Court of Appeal Düsseldorf and one Decision of Staff 18.Senate court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, notifying that it raised no protest to a review procedure on the merits and send all the complaints to archive, namely:

 

>Constitutional Protest Az 2 BvR 730/11 against the decision of 31.3.2010 and of 30. March 2010 of Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 11 W 45/09 (LG-Az 2b o 84/08, concerning the violation of law of trickily acting Judge Mrs. Wolks-Falter)

 

> Constitutional Protest Az 2 BvR 697/11 against the decision of 30. March 2010, of 31.3.2010 and of 12.5.2010 of Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 11 W 38/09 (LG-Az 2b o 154/08, concerning the unlawful actions/sentences of Judge of First Instance and of court of Appeal adopted to March 2008)

 

> Constitutional Protest Az 2 BvR 696/11 against decision of 30. March 2010, 31.3.2010 and 12.5.2010 of Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 11 W 37/09 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01, concerning the unlawful action of the tax office Düsseldorf -Mettmann in year 1979 to March 2001

 

> Constitutional Protest Az 2 BvR 726/11 against decision of 28.2.2011 and 09.13.2010, Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf in OLG-Az 18 W 69/10 (LG-Az 2b o 121/10, separated from treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01)

 

On 29. Juni 2011 Protest submitted to the ECHR (Nr. 47.477 / 11) against six (6) decisions of the BGH, where different explanations contained by the discharges, i.e. against:

> IX ZA 24/11, OLG-Az 18 W 84/10, LG-Az 2b o 29/08
> III ZA 23/11, OLG-Az 11 W 87/10, LG-Az 2b o 268/01
> III ZA 12/11, OLG-Az 11 W 7/11, OLG-Az 11 W 19/10, OLG-Az 11 W 55/10, LG-Az 2b o 203/09
> III ZA 10/11, OLG-Az 18 W 70/10, LG-Az 2b o 120/10;
> III ZA 6/11, OLG-Az 18 W 69/10, LG-Az 2b o 121/10
> BGH Az 2 ARs 140/11, OLG-Düsseldorf Az III-1 Ws 80/11) and against
> BVerfG decision 9.6.2011 Az 2 BvR 763/11, concerns OLG-Az 18 W 76/10,
> LG-Az 2b o 271/01

 

On 5.7.2011 is communicated a judgment of the district court, to set the new scheduled date of hearing on 5.10.2011 for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and enclosed a summons to court.

 

The Judge of district Court, 2b civil chamber are convinced that the Greek Engineer will be unable in the Summer-holidays to find new lawyer and hurry to create a fait accompli in the LG-Az 2b o 268/01.

 

On 11.7.2011 submitted a complaint to the ECHR (Nr. 53.159 / 11) against two decisions of the Constitutional Court (BVerfG), i.e. of Az 2 BvR 730/11 relate OLG-Az 11 W 45/09, LG-Az 2b o 84/08 i.e. the trickily acting Judge Mrs. Wolks-Falter), and against Az 2 BvR 694/11 concerns the OLG-Az 11 W 59/09, LG-Az 2b o 45/09 (Mrs. Strupp-Müller, Mr. Schwarz)

 

On 14. July 2011 issued by the BVerfG decision in Az 2 BvR 1214/11 signed by Di Fabio / Gerhardt / Hermanns regards the constitutional complaint against the decisions from 16.05.2011 and 18.04.2011 of 18. Senate, Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 7/11 (LG-Az 2b o 142/08), notifying that it has not put in process examining the substance of Protest and sends the file to archive.

 

On 14. July 2011 decides the staff Schlick / Wöstmann / Hucke / Seiters / Tombrink of BGH in Az III ZA 21/11 concerning the request to grant PKH by one NZB, against the decision of 16.5.2011 of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 18 W 7 / 11 with the following content:

 

"The request to grant PKH rejected because the NZB has no prospect of success. The decision of the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal, Criminal Department, issued in OLG-Az III-1 Ws 80/11, with which rejected the reprimand and against which the NZB turns, is final in accordance with paragraph § 321a, Nr. 4, leap 4, ZPO ".

 

On 18.7.2011 sent by Greek Engineer the legal objection on the official statements of Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mrs. Jungclaus and Wermeckes in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01), which characterizes as distorting laws and challenged them to withdraw from righteousness. These accusations seem to be well spent. The defendants, Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mr. Wermeckes and Mrs. Jungclaus will soon disappear from the horizon of Greek Engineer.

 

The removals have already been approved, but Greek Engineer is not allowed to know anything.

 

On 18.7.2011 issued Constitutional Court (BVerfG) judgment in Az 2 BvR 991/11, signed by Mellinghoff / Lübbe-Wolf / Huber communicating that do not put in examination proceedings on the substance. The constitutional complaint against the decision of the 18.Senate of court of appeal Düsseldorf from 18.4.11 and 30.9 .10 in OLG-Az 18 W 70/10 (LG-Az 2b o 120/10, separated from the LG-Az 2b o 118/99) ends in archive

 

On 25.7.2011 shall act with the staff Malsch / Stobbe / Weith 18.Senate Court of Appeal in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11, (LG-Az 2b o 177/10) and rejected as unjustified the immediate Protest from 30.11.2010 against Decision of 15.11.2010 of district court, to which the illegally synthesized Staff Judge of First Instance had rejected the request by PKH in LG-Az 2b o 177/10.

 

Insists district court and Court of Appeal argues that immediate protest from 9.10.2007 presented against the decision 18.9.2007 illegally synthesized staff (i.e. In violation of § 75 GVG and infringement of Article 101 GG German Constitution) Mrs. Strupp-Müller /Mrs. Engelkamp-Neeser / Mr. Galle in LG-Az 2b o 271/01, is not contain in the Judiciary Folder.

 

It is understood that the staff 18.Senate Court of Appeal silent about the infringement.

 

The oath of mobsters (Omertá) and the rules of conduct of mobsters have here in the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal applied?

 

On 6. Aug. 2011 legal reprimand submitted (Anhörrüge, under § 321a ZPO) against the decision of 25.7.2011 of Staff Court of Appeal Malsch / Stobbe / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) and requiring approval by one legal Protest; it is argued that the supposedly lost immediate protest from 9.10.2007 against the Decision of illegally synthesized staff Strupp-Müller / Engelkamp-Neeser / Galle is mentioned in three protests, which sent to the Court of Appeal.

 

i.e. accused the Court of Appeal for elimination of immediate protest from 9.10.2007 in LG-Az 2b o 271/01. The period of disappearance of direct protest the judicial folders were stored in 18.Senate and there had removed Mrs. Strupp-Müller through retraining. During the period of presence of Mrs. Strupp-Müller on 18.Senate disappeared immediate protest from 9.10.2007.

(In)directly accused Judges, ostentatiously silent before any court.

 

On 7.8.2011, 8.8.2011, 9.8.2011 sends Greek Engineer in LG-Az 2b o 268/01 a total of seven (7) new evidences about the disappearances of payments to the tax office Mettmann-Düsseldorf and about internal tax authorities evidence, that retained the recoverable taxes of 1979, documented again the crimes of the tax authorities.

 

On 10.8.2011 shall act with the staff Mellinghoff / Lübbe-Wolf / Huber the BVerfG over Protest Az 2 BvR 990/11 brought against the decision dated 14.04.2011 of the Single Judge (= Einzelrichter) Malsch and against the decision of 6.12 .2010 of "Single Judge" (Einzelrichter) Stobbe, court of appeal Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 84/10, (LG-Az 2b o 29/08),

notifying that the constitutional Protest not take in examination proceedings on the substance; In this way illegalities of, "Single Magistrates, Court of Appeal and of Single Judge Mrs. Keiser of the District-Court, are final.

 

On 12.8.2011 reappear more arrogant the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan in Staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Baan / Koewius, with decision in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01, concerning the decision of 18.9.2007 illegally synthesized Staff Court Galle / Strupp-Müller / Engelkamp-Neeser) and rejects the request for dismissal of Mr. Wermeckes due to bias and chicanery, as unjustified.

It shall also be notified that Mrs. Jungclaus already removed to the District-Court Düsseldorf.

 

In other words, the partner in Putsch-Club of 11.Senate Court of Appeal Düsseldorf, of February / March 2010, Mrs. Baan, relieve the accusations which charged the other Putsch-Club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, i.e. States indirectly that it has more possibilities then the Mafiosi.

 

On 19.8.2011 submitted legal reprimand (Anhörrüge, reprimand according to § 321a ZPO) against the decision dated 12.8.2011 signed from the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan, in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG- 2b o 271/01) and the Greek Engineer reiterates that both judges (Mr. Wermeckes and Mrs. Baan) of 11.Senate Court of Appeal, are responsible for penal fault and for offenses under § 339 (StGB) Code penal, and are therefore excluded from decisions in affairs of the Greek Engineer It is again required approval to issue a Legal Protest to be submitted by BGH.

 

On 21.8.2011, 23.8.2011 and 29.8.2011 sent by Greek Engineer in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 268/01 seven (7) new evidence for the crimes of tax office Mettmann-Dusseldorf (refundable taxes, deductions etc.) against Greek Engineer, from the period 1990 / 91/92 and copies of correspondence with authority for prosecution of tax evasion in Wuppertal, as well as copies of decisions of Tax Court where are described irregularities of Tax Office.

 

On 30. Aug. 2011 supplemented the complaint to the ECHR (Nr. 10.924 / 11) with new evidence / copies of the BGH decision, and recalled the scene of offenders judges.

 

On 02. Sept. 2011 sent by Greek Engineer in the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 268/01 photocopies of decision of the tax office Mettmann-Dusseldorf dated 06.11.1980 to return to Greek Engineer 13.424, -DM (surplus) paid for income taxes 1977, which illegally withheld and never explained the reason of withhold nor where registered/booked the money.

 

On 05. Sept. 2011 appears again arrogant, the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Member, Mrs. Baan in staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Baan / Koewius and with decision on OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) reject the application for exclusion of Mrs. Baan, as abusive and presented reprimand dated 08.19.2011 against the decision of 12.8.2011 of the same staff, rejects it as unjustified. Of course do not forget to charge the Greek Engineer for payment of costs.

 

Reader, have you noted, how many times rejected by the Praetorian Putsch-Club requests for exclusion due Bias, chicanery and pervert justice?

 

The Greek saying, “John pours, John drinks” is also valid by the district-Court and Appeal Court, Düsseldorf.

 

On 15. Sept. 2011 sends Greek Engineer in the LG-Az 2b o 268/01 Copies of correspondence with the Tax Office Mettmann-Dusseldorf dated 28.08.1984 and 27.01.1985, with which recalled the admitted reimbursed of income tax of the year 1979, which taxes but not returned, and pleased 2b civil chamber to take the evidences in consideration to the expected decision by the requested PKH; submitted together photocopies of decision by the Tax Court in FG-Az 12 V 255/86 dated 2.12.1988.

 

They have gathered more than 1,000 documents within the folder of the Judiciary LG-Az 2b o 268/01 for the loot and for other crimes by the tax authorities, but the remote controlled judges of 2b Civil chamber, First Instance, bury and no mention in any decision.

 

On 19. Sept. 2011 Chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll sets a new legal trap in Greek Engineer i.e. required by her letter that the Greek Engineer clarifies, what relationship exist between the requests submitted on 15.6.2011 to grant PKH, and requests dated 13.8.2004 of resigned Lawyer Dr. Plötzgen.

 

To complicate the work of the Greek Engineer posted her letter on 29.9.2011 and reaches the Greek Engineer on 30.9.2011, i.e. gives deadline only four days until the hearing date 5.10.2011, to explain the required legal connection between requests from 13.8.2004 and 15.6.2011.

 

The law oblige the Court to doses of at least 14 calendar days period (from the delivery of the letter), which has not been fulfilled.

 

Except that, the Constitutional Court has ruled in many cases that do not allow courts to require excessive legal explanations from parties to proceedings carried PKH, but intriguing Chairwoman neither respects Laws nor Constitution.

 

On 23. Sept. 2011 supplemented the complaint to the ECHR no. 47.477 / 11 with copies of the last two decisions of the BVerfG i.e. from 27.6.2011 in Az 2 BvR 991/11 concerning decision Appeal Court Düsseldorf in OLG-Az 2b o 18 W 70/10 i.e. the LG-Düsseldorf LG-Az 2b o 120/08 (separated from LG-Az 2b o 118/99) and by 27.6.2011 at 2 BvR 726/11 (concerning decision OLG-Düsseldorf OLG-Az 2b o 18 W 69/10), LG-Düsseldorf LG-Az 2b o 121/10 (separated from LG-Az 2b o 271/01).

 

On 23. Sept. 2011 tries the advocate Klöpper to prevent a failure and telephone to Mrs. Chairwoman. He apply to be provided and updated by the Judges Dossier for the case LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and request the postponement of the hearing date, set 5.10.2011, for one month.

 

The Chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll but “she treated him psychologically”, that the lawsuit has no prospect of success, that the binder is massive, and will take a long time to prepare for; she prevents him engaged in representing the way of 5.10.2011, but she disposed in 27.9 .2011 the folder, which returns after three days with the clarification that it would not attend the way of. The chairwoman rejoice for her success.

 

On 01. Oct. 2011 sends Greek Engineer in LG-Az 2b o 268/01 to fulfill the requirement of Chairwoman (4) four pages with crowded explanations about the relations of all with the claim by 15.06.2011 by PKH submitted requests, with requests from 13.8.2004 of resigned Lawyer Dr. Plötzgen. And also explains the relationship between the claim by 15.06.2011 and the original requests of the document dated 20.11.2001.

 

 

The hearing on 05.10.2011 with illegally synthesized staff of District Court

Mündliche Verhandlung am 5.10.2011 mit dem gesetzwidrig gebildeten LG-Gremium

L'udienza al 5.10.2011 coll'illegitimo consiglio di Donne Giudici del Tribunale regionale

 

 

The risk of losing the trial on 5.10.2011 is obvious and Greek Engineer tries with a "legal maneuver" to avoid condemnation by contumacy 

 

Sends on the eve of the trial date, i.e. on 4.10.2011 with Fax request according to § 121 ZPO and ask the court to appoint the 2b Civil chamber a advocate of the three named/listed, on the ground, that all three Lawyers (names and addresses filed) intend to take the case LG-Az 2b o 268/01, provided the Court cede their analog prolongation time for the study of the Dossier and for preparation i.e. to postpone the trial date 5.10.2011.

 

This morning at 09:30 of 5.Oct. 2011, delivers the Greek Engineer to the 2b Secretariat, genuine the application of 4.10.2011 and the secretary shall serve immediately in Chairwoman.

 

In the precedent day sent Fax has not yet reached the 2b Secretariat!!!

 

Defiantly take positions in the Hearing hall also two police officers.

 

The Perplexity of Judges is obvious, when 11:00 begins the meeting with Staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman for hearing procedure, but absent a legal representative for the Greek Engineer.

 

The chairwoman explain to bystanders that she had received news, that the lawyer Mr. Klöpper of the plaintiff Greek Engineer will not appear at trial, and that the trial shall be executed regularly according the ZPO specifications.

 

The advocate Mr. Minnerop of adversary part, NRW, receives from Chairwoman copy of the letter of the advocate Klöpper dated 27.9.2011, with which presents himself as Authorized of Greek Engineer. The lawyer Minnerop requesting dismissal of the action LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and Decision by contumacy.

 

The Judges did not know how to react; they reject the treatment with second judgment by default and postpone the decision on 12.10.2011 for pronunciation of the sentence, regarding the application to grant PKH and for justification.

The whole procedure on 5.10.2011 lasted not even 20 minutes.

 

On 12.10.2011 issued by illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman three decisions.

 

> In the first decision of 12.10.2011 separates from the LG-Az 2b o 268/01 few requests dated 15.6.2011 to grant PKH and transfers them to the request of the LG-Az 2b o 198/11.

 

> By 2nd decision of 12.10.2011 in the LG-Az 2b o 198/01 rejected the request by PKH justified that the individual demands have been barred.

 

> By 3nd decision of 12.10.2011 the illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman rejected the request dated 15.6.2011 to grant PKH for the treatment of the LG-Az 2b o 268/01 on the ground that, supposedly the individual requests of the application are not identical to those of the resigned Attorney Dr. Plötzgen dated 13.8.2004 and that the Plaintiff Greek Engineer, alleged not fully responded to by 19.9.2011 requirement for the Court, to explain the relationship between the individual requests from 15.06.11 to those of resigned lawyer from 13.8.2004.

 

For the indemnity for lost profits, claims the illegally synthesized staff, Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman that the plaintiff supposedly did not show anything newer, than the known precedent with decision of district Court of 4.4.2003 (i.e. of the illegal staff without the legitimate chairman of Civil chamber, with judges Mrs. Brückner-Hoffmann / Mrs. Strupp-Müller / Mrs. Adam) and with the decision of court of Appeal of 23.7.2004 on OLG-Az 18 W 22/03 (i.e. of the illegally synthesized staff Malsch / Haarmann / Mrs. Schröder).

 

Also the history and the case of the lost order of 50.000, - DM of AVT company due to incorrect Tax certification, is supposedly closed, because of the decision of district Court, 2b civil chamber dated 24.8.2006 (signed by Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Elle / Mrs. Strupp-Müller i.e. from blocked due to bias Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Strupp-Müller) and because of the decision of Court of Appeal dated 4.7.2007 in OLG-Az 18 W 2/07.

 

Moreover, the Plaintiff Greek Engineer has supposedly not enclosure the medicine opinion from 11.3.2011 and the illegal staff claims that Greek Engineer not demonstrated that the actions / decisions of officials of the tax authorities were the operative event for the traumatized and therefore concludes, He is not entitled to any compensation for mental anguish.

 

Note

 

The medical opinion dated 11.3.2011 delivered but the 2b civil chamber has eliminated it, on the purpose to reject the claim for compensation for mental anguish.

 

The rejection of claims for compensation for mental anguish is also explained by copying a section from the judgment dated 23.7.2004 of 18.Senate Court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, in OLG-Az 18 W 22/03 i.e. that the Greek Engineer supposedly could be consign the conflicts to a lawyer instead of conducting himself for not having the stress of its own.

 

Moreover accuses Greek Engineer that supposedly hides its revenue and justifies the illusive supposition and suspicion, that the lawyer G. Klöpper would not act if it had not received a payment. Once the Greek Engineer can and pays advances to lawyers, is not entitled to ask for PKH and for the same reason excluded the identification of Attorney on the part of the 2b civil chamber, as the Plaintiff requested on 4.10.2011.

 

The reader will be found that none documentary evidence for the offenses / crimes of tax office or of illegal compositions of staffs District-Court and Court of Appeal, are refer within the decisions dated 12.10.2011 of illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman.

 

That seizures and interceptions refundable tax, on the part of the Inland Revenue, had literally stripped the Greek Engineer and he could not pay for a lawyer to represent him in litigation in the Tax Court, fail to mention systematically.

Only procedural errors of former lawyer and of plaintiff Greek Engineer refer within the decisions from 12.10.2011 of Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffman.

 

All the illegal decisions (4.4.2003, 23.4.2004, 24.8.2006, 4.7.2007) referred to as they are issued by legally synthesized Staffs and as if there was not a request from January 2007 for lift decisions issued by illegally synthesized staffs of First Instance and Court of Appeal.

 

The suspicion, that Greek Engineer can and make advance payments not even have checked in Seven days, time disposable after hearing procedure on 10.5.11, i.e. they could call the Lawyer Klöpper and ask about the question for advance. They did not do so, in order to enable themselves to reject the request dated 4.10.2011 in accordance with § 121 ZPO, in force for hearing procedure with mandatory legal representation.

 

In essence the sly Chairwoman admits that the request § 121 ZRO submitted by Greek Engineer plaintiff is admissible at the hearing procedure, but rejects it with supposedly the suspicion of that Greek Engineer can pay lawyers;+

Additionally she shifted the subject of the request according § 121 ZRO in the procedure to grant PKH, by not seem lack within the decision for Contumacy and thus constitute evidence of illegality.

 

But the delayed decision about the Application to grant PKH, is contrary to the German laws (§ 337 ZPO in conjunction with § 227 ZPO and also contrary to decisions of high courts published in legal revue/journal NJW-RR 2003, 1078); PKH requests must have decided at least 14 days before conducting the hearing treatment, otherwise i.e. if have not decided, the court must postpone the hearing date or result illegal the decision. But something such restrictions are not observed on part of chairwoman Stockschlaeder-Nöll; she will to end with the embarrassing Greek Engineer.

 

The False allegations of illegal synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht causes the Greek Engineer to submit on 14.11.2011 direct protests against the decision of 12.10.2011 with which the request to grant PKH rejected for the LG-Az 2b o 268/01, on 16.11.2011 for the LG-Az 2b o 198/11; he demonstrate on basis of photocopies that the chairwoman is since 18.2.2002 and 5.5.2003 excluded by decisions in affairs of Greek Engineer, because the request of expulsion due partiality have not heard yet; so apply § 47 ZPO suspended rights of practice of judicial acts or decisions, until contemplated exclusion requests.

 

With immediate Protest in LG-Az 2b o 268/01 (34 Pages) Greek Engineer attaches further breach on the part of Judges, § 139 ZPO, Articles 101 GG, and Art. 6 EKMR and "skimming" of the Judicial Dossier, i.e. Removal of the medical report from 11.3.2011 in order to be able to reject the claim for compensation for mental anguish.

 

Submitted jointly decisions BVerfG from 27.6.2011 in Az 2 BvR 696/11 and BGH from 26.5.2011 to Az III ZB 23/11 as well as photocopy of a medical report from 11.3.2011.