He explains his Patents and his Processes against Judges of court of
appeal and 
against Judges of district court – of Düsseldorf - Germany

Dr.-Ing. Th. SARTOROS

 

DAS PATENT "ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISMUS" DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501

WIRD ZUM VERKAUF ANGEBOTEN, PREIS: 265.000,-- € + 19% MWSt

PATENT "ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISM" TO SELL DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501

PRICE 265.000,-- € + 19% Tax (MWSt)

German Justice with Pfahls

The humpbacked = o Kambouris of Photography (= German Justice) sloops the head/pays homage

and Congratulates Holger Pfahls (Holger Palfs) Former Secretary of State for Ministry

for the Protection of the Constitution, after his acquittal.

A similar development was also the case with the dirty money of broke

Jürgen Maßmann ed Winfried Haastert

The BGH Veto did not allow the imprisonment of the corrupt / oiled.

Corruption is lawfully promoted by the courts in Germany

The humpbacked (= who represents the German Justice) acquitted the Tax Fiscal and then

bends his head in front of him. Neither the levying tax evaded was paid, nor the costs -

many thousands DM / Euro - expended for prosecution and capture, were collected.

Because Mr H. Pfahls had been oiled by DM 5,000,000 from Karlheinz Schreiber

escaped Abroad. The investigations of the prosecuting authorities lasted for 5 whole years

(1999-2004).

With a fake passport issued by the Secret Services of Federal Germany he traveled

all over the world, consuming the money (as well as oiling the secret services

of the Federal Republic of Germany)

5 whole years (1999-2004) were investigated by the prosecuting authorities around the globe

to locate Holger Pfahls, spending large sums of money to achieve his arrest.

And after process litigation, ..... he is acquitted.

Political men (including Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who was entangled in the raid

to fund his political influence) supported Holger Pfahls and ordered his acquittal.

The humpbacked (= German Justice) obeyed the political instructions and bent his head.

Over the past 17 years, similar circumstances have been observed in Greek-Engineer damages,

proceedings before the Düsseldorf Court of First Instance and the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal,

responsibility of the Federal Republic of Germany for the legal unlawfulness of the Mettmann city

Tax-office Commander's staff during the years 1979-1999, to damage the Greek-Engineer and inventor.

The Justice of Düsseldorf (Court of First Instance - Appeal Court) complied with blind obedience

the instructions of the Political Men (The German Federation = BRD, and the federal state of

North Rhine Westphalia = NRW)

Here is a list of actions of the tax-office of Mettmman / Düsseldorf (unfinished)

> The Tax Office has invented the hypothetical tax evasion of Greek-Engineer through double

   calculation errors of the revenues of the Greek-Engineers business that exceeded 511,000. - DM

   for purpose to cover its errors.

> executed bank accounts seizures - to cover

Last modified on Friday, 22 February 2019 10:52

 

   

                                   -  2012 – (14.10.2012 εως 31.12.2012 )

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

The tribunal pay-office, Düsseldorf, can´t find where are booked the over-paid 1.182,- €

 

The violation of Law (§ 75, GVG) on the part of Mrs. Brecht, Mrs. Schumacher and Mr. Schwarz

 

The distortions of the mean of medical opinion on the part of Mrs. Strauch, employee of General Public Prosecutor´s office,   accepted by Judges district court, Düsseldorf, Mrs. Brecht/Mrs. Schumacher/Mr. Schwarz, and used against the Greek Engineer

 

Mrs. Baan, Judge of 18.Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, refuses to give “official statement”

   following the law ( § 44 (3) ZPO), but she give acquittal certificate to herself for punishable acts.

 

The staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs. Jürging/Mrs. Brecht, ignore § 280 ZPO and pretend that

  the partial request by computing the minimum damage is inadmissible, because supposedly not given the ZPO such possibility

 

Mrs. Stregel claims on 6.12.2012 that surplus paid court cost is only 703,11 € and not 1.182, - €,

but denies to show where is booked the difference  478,89 €;  

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

     WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

          

Το Ταμείο Δικαστηρίου δεν ευρίσκει που εχει καταχωρήσει την επιπλέον πληρωμή 1.182,-- €

Die Gerichtskasse findet nicht, wo die zuviel gezahlten Gebühren 1.182,- € gespeichert sind

La cassa del tribunale regionale non trova dove é rimasta  Ia somma sovrapagata 1.182,- € 

 

In hostile and almost menacing tone responds to 15.10.2012 the Fund Sub-Head, Mr. Berrisch, of county Court, Düsseldorf, that further questions of Greek Engineer will not respond, and specifies that the account for registration of payments for the treatment of LG-Az 2b o 271/01 was deleted (!) after expire his limit (when did it expire the limit? and by whom was deleted the account?, not clear), and that the surplus payment of 1.182, - € by the Greek Engineer is no longer possible to found (!?) or to ascertain (!?). (see also writing of Mrs. Stregel dated 6.12.2012!)

 

Threatening recalls that the Fund of Court, supposedly on

                                           -  2012 -  Teil 2 (από 30.5.12 εως 14.10.12)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

The Putsch-Club of 11 Senate, court of appeal, Düsseldorf, invites and collaborates with accused Judge, Mr.  Schumacher, on case which concern him personally

 

The alarm system, of district-court, Düsseldorf/ Court of appeal,  Düsseldorf / Attorney General  / Superintendence of tax offices Düsseldorf, howl,

after specifying on 12.7.2012 the claims for compensation 1.779.197, - €,

 

The perfidious tactic of Mrs. Brecht on July 2012

to thrust aside the advocate Lasaroff

from process 2b o 271/01

 

 

The judicial battles of Advocate Lasaroff

against the Member of Putsch-Club, Mrs. Baan

 

The Judges of Putsch-Club of 11.Senat of Court of Appeal

give absolution to themselves for crimes punishable under § 339 StGB

 

Οι Πραξικοπηματίες 11. Συγκλ. Εφετείου δίνουν αθωωτικά Πιστοπoιητικά στον Εαυτόν τους

 

Putschisten des 11.Senats OLG-Düsseldorf erteilen Unschuldsbescheinigungen an sich selbst

 

Putschisti del 11. Senato della Corte d´appello Düsseldorf danno assoluzione a se stessi

 

The Judges of Putsch-Club of 11.Senat of Court of Appeal give absolution to themselves

 

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

     WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC 

 

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

         

On 30. May 2012 sent by the Greek Engineer new protest to the Federal Constitutional Court, which directed against the decision 27.4.2012 of 11. Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, OLG-Az I-11 W 82/10 (LG-Düsseldorf-Az 2b o 143/08), signed by Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Weishaupt /Mr. Koewius.

 

The staff had rejected the arguments of reprimand dated 21.12.2011 and not allowed the Legal Protest, and determined the costs under the wrong paragraph § 97 ZPO.

 

The constitutional protest is also directed against the Decision from 21.12.2011 in OLG-Az 11 W 82/10, (LG-Düsseldorf-Az 2b o 143/08) of illegally synthesized staff (Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Wermeckes /Mr. Koewius), 11. Senate Appeals, Düsseldorf, with the participation of praetorian putsch-club-Member, Mr. Wermeckes, whoever decided by his own 57 unlawful acts and exculpated himself, while approved as legitimate the illegalities of First Instance Judge Engelkamp-Neeser / Mrs. Hoffmann

Last modified on Monday, 18 January 2016 20:56

- 2012 - (από 2.1.2012 έως 29.5.2012) –

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

Judge, Mrs. Brecht, of 2b civil chamber, district court, Düsseldorf,

her training period and violation of Law in year 2012

 

The Opinion of High Civil Court (BGH) about impermissible Protests against

decision of Courts of Appeal, in PKH procedure

 

The General Public Prosecutor's Office, Düsseldorf, as defender of accused Judges

 

The errors of lazy employee of General Public Prosecutor´s office accepted from 

2b civil chamber District-Court, Düsseldorf, (Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs. Brecht)

and applied against the Greek Engineer

 

After the improper use of the legal title “judge of district court” Mr. Schwarz again in action together Judge Mrs. BRECHT and violation of Law GVG

 

The transfer of Mrs. Baan, Member of Praetorian-Putsch-Club of 11.Senate, to the 18.Senate of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf; Consequences, 34 perversion of Justice

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

         

The new year, 2012, starts with a (legal) Blame on 02.01.2012 of Greek Engineer according to

§ 321a ZPO against a decision of 21.12.2011, 11. Senate Mrs. Rotzheim / Koewius / Weishaupt to OLG-Az 11 W 5/11 and accusations towards the staff, that determine costs which may not be based on § 97 ZPO, but based on § 118 ZPO, because it is by PKH process, and the matter has been since 2001, but the Senate 11. (in its old or new composition) insists to apply the wrong Paragraph (motivated by revenge)

 

On 4.1.2012 shall act the 18.Senate, Court of appeal, with the Staff Malsch / Stobbe / Haarmann in OLG-Az 18 W 87/10 (concerns the LG-Az 2b o 198/11) and rejects direct Protest dated 16.11.2011 against the first instance decision of 12.10.2011 of illegal Staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Hoffmann / Mrs. Brecht, with the assertion that it was late, and after passing one month from the uptake of the decision.

 

About the Illegal Composition of 2b civil chamber writes not a word. "Omertá" of mobsters then.

On 5.1.2012 (Legal) Blame submitted pursuant to paragraph § 198 GVG because of the excessive duration of trial treatment LG-Az 2b o 118/99 and thus warned the

Last modified on Sunday, 17 January 2016 13:55

                                                          - 2011-   (17.11.2011 bis 4.1.2012)

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A  INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

The last decisions of Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members (Mrs. Baan/Mr. Wermeckes) of the 11.Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf

 

The new composition (Mrs. Rotzheim /Mr. Koewius /Mr. Weishaupt) of the 11.Senate, but with the same mentality   

 

The crushing cliffs of new paragraph § 198 GVG, the sentences of BGH and ECHR

and the resulting legal implications

 

Advocate Mr. Tegebauer and the refusal of ECHR 

 

 

 

On 17. Nov. 2011 Advocate Lasaroff notifies to the Court of Appeal that intends to bring an appeal against the second judgment by default dated 12.10.2011 LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and requested the provision PKH for appeal.

 

So begins by the Greek Engineer a new adventure by 18. Senate Court of appeal Düsseldorf no. Protocol  18 U 223/11.

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ  Η  ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ  ΝΑ  ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ  ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ  ΣΤΟΝ   ΕΛΛΗΝΑ  ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

     WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC 

 

PERCHE  LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

 

 

On 23.11.2011 the illegally synthesized staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffmann adopt a decision in LG-Az 2b o 268/01 and rejects the immediate protest from 14.11.2011 with the following justification:

 

The Plaintiff has not shown that in the Dossier was contained the request from 12.11.2002 for exclusion of chairwoman. But for the exclusion request from 18.12.2002 writes not a word!   OMERTÁ

 

Moreover:

 

Doctor Med. failed in his Opinion, dated 11.3.2011, to detect supposedly psychical wounds by Greek Engineer, impudently pretends the illegal staff Stockschlaeder-Nöll / Mrs. Brecht / Mrs. Hoffmann of 2b civil chamber!

 

On 24. Nov. 2011 adopts a decision the 18.Senate Court of appeal, Malsch / Stobbe / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 13/11 (LG-Az 2b o 177/10) and rejects the reprimand from 6.8.2011 against the decision of 25.7.2011 of the same staff as unjustified and pretends that the decision does not offend the rights of the plaintiff, and additionally not approve Legal protest, to the Greek Engineer.

 

Here the 18. Senate Court of appeal mixes two different reprimands but does

Last modified on Thursday, 14 January 2016 13:59

- 2011 - (από 7.6.11 εως 12.10.2011)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

 

Oath of Mobster “Omertá”, and the decisions of Putsch-club (Mrs. Jungclaus/
/Mrs. Baan/Mr. Wermeckes)

 

Indifference or paid Tolerance, of BGH / BVerfG / ECHR (in Strasbourg / France)

 

The trap of Stockschlaeder-Nöll dated 19. Sept. 2011 in LG-Az 2b o 268/01

 

The false allegations of Stockschlaeder-Nöll to keep off the advocate Mr. Klöpper

 

The Hearing on 5.Oct. 2011 in treatment LG-Az 2b o 268/01 with the illegal staff (Stockschlaeder-Nöll/Mrs. Brecht/Mrs. Hoffman)

 

The request according § 121 ZPO and the perplexity of Judges 2b civil chamber

 

The elimination of the medical opinion from judicial folder, to enable the judges, to reject claims for compensation for mental anguish, because of the crimes of tax office

 

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ


WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS


POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC


PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

On 7. June 2011 adopts by the Praetorian Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Jungclaus / Wermeckes new provocative decision in OLG-Az 11 W 12/11 (LG-Az 2b o 271/01) i.e. Involving the Praetorian Putsch-Club-Members Mrs. Jungclaus and the Phantom of the Opera 11. Senate named Wermeckes and decide that immediate protest from 6.1.2011, is abusive and discarded.


The Protest have allegedly to be signed by a Attorney, argued the Putsch-Club; the expenses for Protest imposed on Greek Engineer and determined again based on the wrong paragraph of the ZPO. 

 

Note: the argument is false, because concerns PKH-Procedure, and any citizen can sign application

 

On 9. June 2011 adopted by the BVerfG notification to Az 2 BvR 763/11 signed by Di Fabio / Gerhardt / Herrmanns that the protest against the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal decision of 22.2.2011 and 7.12.2010 in OLG-Az I-18 W 76/10 (LG-Az 2b the 271/01), not put in examination proceedings on the merits (and ends on file). So become Final again illegalities of Judge of First Instance and of Court of Appeal.

 

The rule of law becomes in this way a Member entrenched lawlessness, corruption and chicanery Justice.

 

On 14.6.2011 submitted to the District-Court a fresh application (68 pages) for approval PKH for the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01, for the following partial

- 2011 - (27.3.2011 - 6.6.2011)

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

The three different explanations of BGH for the same case, i.e. refusal to grant PKH
for a “Legal protest”; The shortcomings of PKH-procedure

 

The Staff Stüttgen /Mrs. Dr. Hubrach / Wißmann of penal section of court of Appeal Düsseldorf, reject Request in Az III- 1 Ws 80/11 to grant PKH for criminal proceedings
against Judges of District court and judges of court of appeal Düsseldorf
accused for perversion of Justice

 

General Attorney of German Federal Republic and the case III-1 Ws 80/11 court of appeal, Düsseldorf

 

Activity of conspirators Mrs. Jungclaus/Mrs. Baan/Mr. Wermeckes in summer 2011

 

The refusal of Judges Malsch/Haarmann/Weith of 18.Senate of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf, regarding the applicability of § 256 ZPO, and OMERTÁ of mobsters

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ


WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS


POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC


PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

 

On 27.3.2011 submitted application to the BGH (Az III ZA 4/11) for review of the decision of 28.2.2011, 18. Senate Malsch / Haarmann / Weith in OLG-Az 18 W 69/10 (LG-Az 2b o 121/10 ) and request to grant PKH.

 

On 29.3.2011 arises Constitutional Complaint (Az 2 BvR 726/11) against the decision dated 28.2.2011 and of 13.9.2010, 18. Senate (Malsch / Haarmann / Weith) Court of Appeal in Düsseldorf, OLG-Az 18 W 69/10 (concerning 2b o 121/10 separated from 2b o 271/01)

 

On 30.3.2011 submitted to the BGH request to grant PKH by one NZB for review the decision dated 9.3.2011, of 11. Senate court of appeal Düsseldorf i.e. of the Putsch-Club Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Jungclaus / Koewius , OLG-Az 11 W 87/10 (LG-Az 2b o 268/01), with which was rejected the reprimand (Anhörrüge) as abusive and did not allow the Legal Protest.

 

On 30.3.2011 issued by Constitutional Court (BVerfG) decisions in Az 2 BvR 900/10, Az 2 BvR 1632/10 and Az 2 BvR 852/10 with announcement that did not put in review procedure on the substance the constitutional complaints directed against the decision of the Praetorian Putsch-Club dated 22.2.2010, 30.3.2010, 31.3.2010, 12.5.2010 Cases OLG-Az 11 W 45/09 and OLG-Az 11 W 59/09 and thus become interim final illegalities, chicanery, perversions of justice, costs identification

 

- 2011 - (6.1.2011 - 21.3.2011)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

 

How are computed the perversions of Justice on the part of illegal synthesized staffs of district court of Düsseldorf

 

 

Suspicious silence of higher courts about illegalities of Judges of inferior courts

 

 

Medical Dr. Lutz Expertise, blame Tax Office, Judge, Public Prosecutor´s office Düsseldorf

 

 

Request of advocate Weidemann the hearing date 16.3.2011 one moth to postpone rejected 

 

 

The meeting on 16. March 2011 with illegally synthesized Court staff Düsseldorf;


and the illegal sentence of Mrs. Stockschlaeder-Nöll

 

 

 PETITION by complaint department of parliament NRW in Düsseldorf 

 

 

Proceedings to force the public prosecution to prefer criminal charges
of judges of district court, and of Judges court of appeal Düsseldorf

 

Πως διαπράττονται οι διαστροφές Δικαιοσύνης από παράνομα συντεθιμένα Επιτελεία

 

Wie werden die Rechtsbeugungen seitens gesetzwidrig gebildeten LG-Gremien vollzogen

 

Come si compiono le perversioni di Giustizia da parte di consigli del Tribunale regionale

 

H ύποπτη σιωπή των ανωτάτων Δικαστηρίων στις παρανομίες Δικαστών Πρωτοδικείου

 

Das Schweigen der höheren Gerichte (BGH/BVerfG) über Rechtsbeugungen LG-Richter

Lo sopsetto tacere dei Tribunali supremi sulle perversioni di Giustizia dai Giudici inferiori

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ


WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS


POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC


PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

 

With immediate protest Dated 6.1.2011 against the first instance decision of 15.12.2010 signed Mrs. Keiser / Mrs. Moosbrucker / Schwarz in treating Az 2b o 271/01 focuses the Greek Engineer the oversights of Judges, for elucidating charges against tax office and violation of paragraph 139 ZPO and Article 103 GG of the German Constitution.

 

On 9. Jan. 2011 raised reprimand (Anhörrüge) against the decision of 29.12.2010 of Praetorian coup (Putsch-Club) Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Jungclaus / Müller in Case Az 11 W 54/10 (LG-Az 2b o 142/08) and accused the new Vice-President Mrs. Rotzheim Court of Appeal Düsseldorf, that she protects the coup Members Mrs. Jungclaus /Mr. Müller, instead of evicting them from her team. He focuses on the Illegal Composition of Staff Mrs. Rotzheim / Mrs. Jungclaus / Müller and contradicted the decision determining the court costs on basis of incorrect paragraph of the ZPO.

 

The City Police in

- 2010 - (7. 8. 2010 – 31.12.2010 )

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK INGENEER

 

The violation of § 75 GVG (law on the establishment and operation of the Courts)
on the part of district-Court (LG-Düsseldorf), Court of Appeal (OLG-Düsseldorf)
and the behavior of Civil High Court (BGH), and German Constitutional Court (BVerfG)

 

The revenge of “Judge of district court” Mr. Schwarz

 

The letter of Mrs. Stregel till June 2010 about 9.454,69 € not paid court fees for lawsuit Az 2b o 271/01

 

The ascertainment of 2b civil chamber on 13.8.2010 that court fees for 2b o 271/01 are full paid (and results a surplus of 1.182,-€)

 

The unlawful decisions of Judge, Mrs. Keiser, district court, and her speculation

 

How the 4th Senate court of Appeal Mr. Kneist / Mrs. Döinghaus / Mr. Brüggemann
avoid the substance of protest against the decision of illegal staff of district court

 

The Members of praetorian Putsch-Club of 11.Senate of court of appeal Düsseldorf Mrs. Jungclaus, Mr. Wermeckes, Müller discharged themselves

 

The Polish Engineer IVAN ZILIC blames the Chairman of 11. Senate court of appeal and Vice-president of court of appeal Düsseldorf, Mr. Dr. Bünten, by bribery and venality

 

Landgericht, Oberlandesgericht, Bundesgerichthof, und Bundesverfassungsgericht
und der § 75 GerichtsVerfassungsGesetz (GVG)

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ


WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS


POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC


PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

On 7. August 2010 issued decision by the Constitutional Court (BVerfG) under the chairmanship of the President Voßkuhlen, with which declares, that the protest against the decisions of the high Civil Court (BGH) Az III ZB 17 / 09 dated 9.4.2009 and 19.3.2009, concerns Protests against decisions of the Court of Appeal of Düsseldorf dated 30.6.2008 in Case OLG-Az 11 W 26/08 i.e. in the treatment LG-Az 2b o 271/01, are not introduced in proceedings of substance for decision (and remitted in archive).

 

In this way becomes final the denounced unlawful decisions of Judges Dr. Bünten / Mielke / Busch 11.Senate of court of Appeal Düsseldorf and in extension the repulsed decisions of Judges of the county-Court Dusseldorf.

 

The putsch-club of OLG-11.Senate had argued that even in PKH process the plaintiff must be replaced by a Lawyer and

 

- 2010 - (5. 1. 2010 – 6. 8. 2010)

 

 

WHY GERMANY MUST PAY A INDEMNITY TO THE GREEK ENGINEER

 

 

The Delirium of Members of Putsch-club of 11. Senate, court of Appeal, Düsseldorf
and Mr. Wermeckes the Phantom of Opera

 

The three Putsch-Groups of 11. Senate of court of Appeal, Düsseldorf
(Wermeckes / Mrs. Grabensee / Dahm), (Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs. Baan / Müller), and (Dr. Bünten, Mrs. Jungclaus / Mrs. Baan / Müller / Wermeckes)
and the perversion of Justice with 84 decision within 3 Months against the Greek Engineer, under instruction of chairman Mr. Bünten

 

The menaces of Judge Mr. Hiegert of constitutional Court (BVerfG)

 

The 5 illegal decisions of Judges Mrs. Hoffmann/Mrs. Pietroschinsky/Mrs. Henkefend
and the violation of law (§ 47 ZPO, § 75 GVG)

 

The false calculation of Mrs. Stregel about the court fees for LG-Az 2b o 271/01 in order to delay the service of action, 

 and the surplus of 1.182,- € payment for the court fees, hided 4 years

 

 

Das Delirium der Putschisten des 11. Senats des Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

 

Lo delirio dei Membri del Putschclub dell 11. Senato della Corte d´Appello

 

ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΛΗΡΩΣΕΙ ΑΠΟΖΗΜΙΩΣΗ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΑ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΟΝ

 

WARUM DEUTSCHLAND DEN GRIECHISCHEN INGENIEUR ENTSCHÄDIGEN MUSS

 

POURQUOI L´ ALLEMAGNE DOIS PAYER A DEDOMNAGEMENT AU INGENIEUR GREC

 

PERCHE LA GERMANIA DEVE PAGARE UN RISARCIMENTO DEI DANNI ALL´ INGEGNERE GRECO

 

 

On 5. January 2010 submitted by the Greek Engineer request of exclusion of all judges of 11. Senate of court of Appeal on the grounds that, on 14 judgments given on 23.9.2009 denies the validity and application of European and German law, ignored the arguments of the applicant and the decisions are arbitrary.

 

Alarm and collusive activity prevail in 11. Senate and by the planned crime against EuGVVO, EGBGB, GG, ZPO employ three auxiliary young judges of Court of appeal for creating three support i.e. three active groups and so neutralize for ever the inconvenient Greek Engineer.

 

The first group (Wermeckes / Mrs. Grabensee / Dahm) appears for the first time, creates the impression of independent Staff, but it is of illegal composition, because missing the Chairman of Senate appointed by law § 122 GVG, and decides on 16.2.2010 in 14 cases that the request for exclusion of Judges Mrs. Jungclaus /Mrs. Baan / Müller

StartPrev12NextEnd
Page 1 of 2

Visitors: Today 14 | Yesterday 21 | Week 76 | Month 424 | All 2069

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok Decline