He explains his Patents and his Processes against Judges of court of
appeal and 
against Judges of district court – of Düsseldorf - Germany

Dr.-Ing. Th. SARTOROS

Dr. Ing. Th. Sartoros Patente

DE102010015501B4

MECANISME D´ ANTICYTHERE

DPMA-Nr.:
pdf.symbol
102010015501.2

DE000002448469C2 2

Pompe avec volume variable automatiquement,
a variation continue

DPMA-Nr.:
pdf.symbol
P 24 48 469.3

DE 4010764 A1

Variateur Hydraulique avec 3 arbres rotatives
du type differential
pdf.symbol
DE 4010764A1

 

DE 4014241 A1
Variateur Hydraulique de construction epicycloidal du type differential avec blocage automatique
pdf.symbol
DE 04014241A1

 

Variateur Hydraulique de construction epicycloidal du type differential avec blocage automatique

 

LE BREVET "MECANISME D´ANTICYTHERE " DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501
EST a VENDRE, PRIS: 265.000,-- € + 19% MWSt

PATENT "ANTIKYTHERA MECHANISM" TO SELL DPMA Nr. 10 2010 105 501

PRICE 265.000,-- € + 19% Tax (MWSt)

BGH (Supreme Federal Court of Justice) DECISION of 24 May 2018 Az III ZR 332/17 concerning the NZB of 19.3.2018 against OLG-Düsseldorf Judgment 18.10.2017 Az 18 U 69/16 (LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 271/01   The BGH-III Senate has its own jurisdiction ignored when passing the resolution to III ZR 332/17 of 24 May 2018 ( about Higher Regional Court Dusseldorf Az 18 U 69/16, LG-Düsseldorf 2b o 271/01) :    Here are only two BGH decisions mentioned, the BGH III civil Senate (Mr. Herrmann /Mr. Seiters /Mr. Reiter /Mrs Liebert / Mrs Böttcher) on May 24, 2018 ignored, at the adoption of the decision on Az III ZR 332/17 (regarding the (NZB=) non-admission complaint against OLG-Düsseldorf decision Az 18 U 69/16 from 18.10.2018 , LG-Düsseldorf Az 2b o 271/01), thus proving that it is prepared to take political decisions (and able to implement the received order) if the legal cases bring legal action for liability claims for damages amounting to millions (in €).    The first decision of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) is several times repeated, both, as well as in the LG-Düsseldorf (Az 2b o 271/01) process and OLG-Düsseldorf (18 U 69/16) as well as in the non-admission complaint of 19 March 2018 to BGH AZ III ZR 332/17, and has the…

Visiteurs: aujourd'hui 2 | hier 19 | semaine 78 | mois 343 | global 1443

Les cookies nous permettent de gérer les services proposés par notre site. En utilisant notre site, vous en acceptez, de fait, l'utilisation.
En savoir plus Ok Refuse